It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In their latest effort to scare the country and lawmakers into dealing with the sequester, the White House is now saying that because of spending cuts to the Department of Homeland Security, there will be an increase in illegal immigration. According to the Washington Times,
The Obama administration on Monday warned the nation to expect an increase in illegal immigration if the automatic budget cuts go into effect Friday — the latest caution from a White House determined to raise the heat on congressional Republicans.
President Obama has framed the choice as one between higher taxes or lower security, bolstered by Homeland Security Secretary Janet A. Napolitano’s warning Monday that the U.S. Border Patrol will be forced to furlough agents, costing nearly a quarter of the workforce
Originally posted by Krazysh0t
What I really want to know is why when a government agency has to cut back their funding, the workers are the first to suffer. I know for a fact that not a single budget for any government agency in the U.S. is 100% allocated to staffing. Also this 2% reduction isn't really even a reduction. It's a decrease in the growth of the government. So the budget is still bigger than last year. In other words if we got by just fine last year why do we have to make such huge sacrifices to pay for agencies that are still getting a bigger budget than last year?
Originally posted by grey580
reply to post by jibeho
Actually the really funny part is that people think that by adding more security at the border we'll stem the tide of illegal immigrants.
If you believe that then I have some swamp land to sell ya.
Originally posted by sealing
I think it's hilarious that a right wing
shill news site like Townhall says,
"Obama's resorting to scare tactics".
"News" orginazations like Town hall and the rest of the NRA,
Koch brothers, Alex Jones Scare Machine,
must be worried about losing work.
Obama toured a ship factory in east Virginia that makes nuclear submarines and told workers their jobs are "in jeopardy" unless the Republicans agree to an alternative debt reduction plan that includes higher tax revenue.
"The sequester will weaken America's economic recovery," Obama told thousands of workers who gathered on the concrete floor of a cavernous building at Newport News Shipbuilding. "It will weaken our military readiness. And it will weaken the basic services that the American people depend on every single day."
Looming Cuts Spur Mass Release of Illegal Immigrants
In a highly unusual move, federal immigration officials have released hundreds of detainees from immigration detention centers around the country in an effort to save money as automatic budget cuts loom in Washington, officials said…
The agency, Ms. Christensen added, “is continuing to prosecute their cases in immigration court and, when ordered, will seek their removal from the country.”
Officials did not reveal precisely how many detainees were released or where the releases took place, but immigrants’ advocates around the country have been reporting that hundreds of detainees were freed in numerous locations , including Hudson County, N.J.; Polk County, Texas; Broward County, Fla.; and New Orleans; and from centers in Arizona, Alabama, Georgia and New York.
While immigration officials occasionally free detainees on supervised release, this mass release — so many in such a short span of time — appears to be unprecedented in recent memory, immigration advocates said.
Originally posted by Krazysh0t
What I really want to know is why when a government agency has to cut back their funding, the workers are the first to suffer. I know for a fact that not a single budget for any government agency in the U.S. is 100% allocated to staffing. Also this 2% reduction isn't really even a reduction. It's a decrease in the growth of the government. So the budget is still bigger than last year. In other words if we got by just fine last year why do we have to make such huge sacrifices to pay for agencies that are still getting a bigger budget than last year?
Originally posted by JeffreyCH
Originally posted by Krazysh0t
What I really want to know is why when a government agency has to cut back their funding, the workers are the first to suffer. I know for a fact that not a single budget for any government agency in the U.S. is 100% allocated to staffing. Also this 2% reduction isn't really even a reduction. It's a decrease in the growth of the government. So the budget is still bigger than last year. In other words if we got by just fine last year why do we have to make such huge sacrifices to pay for agencies that are still getting a bigger budget than last year?
Growing up my step father worked as a Gov't accountant, fairly high level lifer. Around the end of the fiscal year he would get real moody, I asked him why one time. This was about 1984, the reply was "I have to figure out where to waste 10's of thousands of dollars" astonished I asked "Why?" He went on to explain that in order for his dept to get a bigger budget for the next year they had to show that they needed it by using all of this years budget and then some. So by having a deficit they could then get more money, even though the budget was basically thrown away at the end of the year. So rather then have a surplus, that carried over to the next year and their budget cut, they would book a bunch of useless seminars and training, ironically enough most of those were about ways to cut cost's lol. I was 15 at the time, since then I have believed that the whole system is crooked. That's why budgets get bigger and bigger each year, and there is so much waste.