two pics that really smacked me in the face .....

page: 1
76
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
+64 more 
posted on Feb, 24 2013 @ 05:09 PM
link   
I am not sure where to even put this..if not here , then mods do what thow wilt


So, every once and a while i am sure many of you have came across pics that hit home or just simply make you say wow ... i have two that did that to me today , and i wish to share them with all of you and possibly gain some feed back on how they make you feel ?

many thanks

Humbly

LSH







posted on Feb, 24 2013 @ 05:12 PM
link   
Love these pics!


So much can be said with a picture.

If I was surrounded by my enemies, would I be the threat?

and...

What is the Alien really thinking?..."Idiots"

Peace

edit on 24-2-2013 by jude11 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 24 2013 @ 05:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by jude11
Love these pics!


So much can be said with a picture.

Peace


ineed , thank you kind sir jude

humbly

LSH



posted on Feb, 24 2013 @ 05:17 PM
link   
reply to post by LightningStrikesHere
 


Hits the nail on the head, now doesn't it?
I blame pretty much the "invention" of money for this. While a plain old fashioned barter system exchanges goods that we have in abundance against goods we have not, money can buy "Anything". It has no value other than the # assigned to each product. $100 can by anything listed for $100. be it food, fuel, drugs, ammo, sex, you name it. While barter is a direct offer. I have X in surplus and need Y in exchange.



posted on Feb, 24 2013 @ 05:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by Guenter
reply to post by LightningStrikesHere
 


Hits the nail on the head, now doesn't it?
I blame pretty much the "invention" of money for this. While a plain old fashioned barter system exchanges goods that we have in abundance against goods we have not, money can buy "Anything". It has no value other than the # assigned to each product. $100 can by anything listed for $100. be it food, fuel, drugs, ammo, sex, you name it. While barter is a direct offer. I have X in surplus and need Y in exchange.



yes ,indeed ..but i feel even if we were some how able to work out a system like that , we would still have people struggling to power ....


thank you for your post

Humbly

LSH



posted on Feb, 24 2013 @ 05:28 PM
link   
reply to post by LightningStrikesHere
 


Good post and that puts into context that most can understand. Gee....wonder who the next target is. The first two guesses don't count.


+36 more 
posted on Feb, 24 2013 @ 05:42 PM
link   
reply to post by LightningStrikesHere
 

Lol. Seeing that picture reminded me of this rather more cynical one...




posted on Feb, 24 2013 @ 05:45 PM
link   
In the first Pic , its obvious that the U.S. is surrounding Iran to take siege of their country to take control of their oil. I've have no clue on the second pic because I don't know the true agenda of the greys.



posted on Feb, 24 2013 @ 06:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by Severin
reply to post by LightningStrikesHere
 

Lol. Seeing that picture reminded me of this rather more cynical one...




I laughed soooo hard at that!!!



posted on Feb, 24 2013 @ 06:18 PM
link   
First pic is just garbage....

There are 45 police stations in my city, can gangs be a threat? YES.

*sigh*


+9 more 
posted on Feb, 24 2013 @ 06:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by CALGARIAN
First pic is just garbage....

There are 45 police stations in my city, can gangs be a threat? YES.

*sigh*



is this sarcasm ?



posted on Feb, 24 2013 @ 08:11 PM
link   
imo, you have 3 kool pics. Your avatar is awsome. The look of complete horror on that little bloke is amazing.

second



posted on Feb, 24 2013 @ 11:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by greatfriendbadfoe
imo, you have 3 kool pics. Your avatar is awsome. The look of complete horror on that little bloke is amazing.

second


oh thank you kind sir
i was wondering when someone was going to come along and say something about that


+5 more 
posted on Feb, 24 2013 @ 11:55 PM
link   
reply to post by CALGARIAN
 


This analogy doesn't work or make any sense. It's a missed point.
edit on 24-2-2013 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 25 2013 @ 01:38 AM
link   
Damned non-intervention protocols...

You don't understand. We are to be allowed to kill each other off (by the bushel) and die by disease, famine, whatever...

just as long as murderous megalomaniacs don't go off the deep end and try to kill everyone.

Maybe thats why it hasn't happened yet.



posted on Feb, 25 2013 @ 01:45 AM
link   
Well I'm honestly a bit torn about that picture for a number of reasons.

The political scientist (its my degree) says this is just what happens in the world. Resources are fought over, always have been, and those with military might usually make the rules.

The normal part of me says that, well we should let countries have self-determination, (ala Woodrow Wilson) and conduct their affairs without US interference.

Then the realist in me says why in the world did Rockefeller and Standard Oil hand over the rights to the oil deposits when they discovered oil in the Middle East. They could have simply bought off the local tribal leaders and kept it?



posted on Feb, 25 2013 @ 02:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by Hopechest
They could have simply bought off the local tribal leaders and kept it?




To the OP, thanks for this thread, we really need humour in the face of all the stupid.

WRT your pic about the bases, yeah, bad old Iran is such a threat to everyone. Rather let the US build military bases all over the world, that'll keep us all safe. NOT.



posted on Feb, 25 2013 @ 02:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by harryhaller

Originally posted by Hopechest
They could have simply bought off the local tribal leaders and kept it?




To the OP, thanks for this thread, we really need humour in the face of all the stupid.

WRT your pic about the bases, yeah, bad old Iran is such a threat to everyone. Rather let the US build military bases all over the world, that'll keep us all safe. NOT.


Not sure why you gave me that shocky face.

Here's a great conspiracy that I haven't seen mentioned around here (I have a ton of them). Saudi Arabia was officially formed in 1932, although the struggles were going on since the early 20th century.

Guess what year Rockefeller's Standard Oil found oil under the sand?

You guessed it, 1932.

Coincidence or something deeper? You be the judge.



posted on Feb, 25 2013 @ 02:22 AM
link   
Reminds me of a game of risk.


+1 more 
posted on Feb, 25 2013 @ 02:25 AM
link   







new topics
top topics
 
76
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join