Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by solomons path
Asbestos stated purpose was for insulation. Thalidomide stated purpose was a sedative.
I don't see those being used in such a way now . . . Why? They are too dangerous. I don't see why it's so hard for people to comprehend, either?
You are making a case FOR guns? I think you just proved the exact opposite. Thanks.
Where did I mention guns in that post . . . ? You made the claim that cars stated purpose was benign . . . I showed you why that doesn't matter.
Again, we are back to a comprehension problem. You were the one that brought up guns and their purpose. I've been talking about cars, mostly, or
transportation in general.
I don't really care if you own a vehicle or not . . . as I don't think you should. They are death machines. You said BC was too big and dangerous
for life without a vehicle . . . I just commented that you seem quite frightened to live in a world/place without them. Maybe you should move
someplace more convenient/safer . . . leave BC for those that aren't afraid to live their lives in wooded peace and splendor?
ETA - also . . .IF we were talking about guns . . . How would my statment prove your point or me wrong? You said a gun's only purpose is to harm . .
. They seem to be doing that quite well? So, how does my analogy prove that wrong? They work how they are supposed to.
Now a car and their stated purpose on the other hand . . . that's another story. They may work for transport, but like my examples, the benefits are
not worth the carnage cause and lives they destroy. You may disagree, but I'm sure the cigarette, asbestos, and pharm industries disagree about the
dangers of their products too. Comprehension . . . jeez!
edit on 2/24/13 by solomons path because: (no reason given)
2/24/13 by solomons path because: (no reason given)