It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by freedomSlave
reply to post by CosmicCitizen
There should be more legislation on personal vehicles . And there are people who shouldn't have a license .
or is this thread about a sad attempt to have a discussion on gun control ?
Not really sure of the op's angleedit on 24/2/13 by freedomSlave because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ResistTreason
Gee, one would think that if the empty-headed gun-haters were so concerned about deaths, they would use up all of there time and energy trying to prevent auto deaths,drug deaths, and medical related deaths before trying to take away "scary" looking black OBJECTS that are completely harmless by themselves.
They have an extreme prejudice against an OBJECT and have ZERO concern of deaths in reality. But thats what Traitors and Bad Guys like to consume their energy with, stripping firearms from law-abiding citizens.
Originally posted by freedomSlave
reply to post by solomons path
I agree there should be random check stops for vehicle safety. They do it to truckers as they should also do with personal vehicles. Get caught driving drunk should lose license for 2 years get caught again loss it for good .
If a person is a chronic speeder they should lose their license as well after multiple offenses . People who are constantly distracted while driving should lose their license after multiple offences .
I can see the check stop going threw as it will generate money for the state . The latter the government will start losing some revenue so I don't see it as being viable
Originally posted by snowspirit
reply to post by freedomSlave
You clearly don't live in BC. They already do random safety checks for vehicles there, and they're a little too picky sometimes. They even get into vehicle cosmetics.
They also already have some of the toughest drinking driving laws there.
www.icbc.com...
To the person suggesting stickers on the license plate, a yearly one is enough. That already exists.
All these new legislative processes people are suggesting to be tougher, and to apply them monthly
All the extra cost is going to come from taxes, either from income, sales (on purchases), or gas hikes.
Besides this thread just seems like another pitch to wrap people up in bubble wrap, unless the gun control idea is scrapped.
Originally posted by solomons path
BC . . . get out and use what the good lord gave you. Why would you be in a car anyway . . . it's so beautiful up there. No car . . . no firearm . . . just nature.
It's not like you have dangerous wildlife in those parts . . .
Originally posted by intrepid
reply to post by solomons path
A cars main purpose is transportation. A guns main purpose is to do harm. Whether righteous or not. If one can't see that there is a comprehension problem here.