Originally posted by drbryankkruta
I thought the Nicklas Burg beheading contraversy where in a shoulder patch from a US uniforms left shoulder was seen in the lower right hand of the
cameras frame of view proved that the US was present there then. I thought he was the first of many taped when beheaded.
[edit on 31/10/2004 by drbryankkruta]
This texte was written on 28/05/04 by Alchy, you will excuse my english,
"
Who ask himself the question why, Nick, was in American’s jails a few days before he died and for witch obscure reason did he become a
“terrorist-prisoner” of Americans? Nothing is clear in his arrest by Iraqi police. The chef of the police in Iraq is the same for Iraqis and Americans
their!
Why was he slackened (got free) by the army without reason, process or excuse, as he was said lost?
Why did the terrorists have strangely chosen internet to show it, when it doesn’t allow to verify any faking? Where is the tape?
Why is he set on a chair which “very exactly same” model was photographed at Abu-Ghraib prison?
Why do the yellow wall, the floor, his prisoner-clothes look all the same in Abu-Ghraib prison?
Why do we hear american’s spokes in back-sounds with English and Russian accents?
Why the terrorists do looks tall, fat, and white (hands), (someone called them the Stoogies) and wouldn’t have Arabic accent?
Why do a zoom cut the scene where he is projected on the floor, then menaced with a cut (4 or 5 frame only) posed on his neck (yes, only!), his hair
pulled –zoom- and the barbarity begins?
Why doesn’t he struggle while yelling, once the sound is harmonised with the video (he moves a little because he is moved by the man in his back)?
Why do some doctors say blood doesn’t flow like that when a jugular is cut on a living man?
Why do CNN specialists of Zarkaoui say it is not his voice, not his leg prosthesis (no prosthesis at all), not his method, not his way of thinking,
but CIA say so?
Why do the chef affirm he is Zarkaoui and tell it without any problem in front of polices of the world, but is completely masked?
Why does he read his letter with no real conviction, passion or anger and the terrorists cries of believers to God (halla huakbah) seem more like
tired but obedient foot ball supporter’s cry?
Why do, since the body was found, nobody made autopsy?
The face of Nick is over contrasted, saturated, coloured. I first thought it was a montage (I've never believe in that movie) but I think only the
colour of his face was change, so that, his face looks pinkie-orange and the skin of the terrorists, white-grey. The light on his face is not natural
in order to show a difference between his skin and the bad ones.
An other strange thing is that the CIA or Pentagon hasn’t work on that video and dont comment it anymore and have stop to speak about even to know
more about anything you want. It remains me the recent rocketing on Palestinian demonstrators that have definitely stoped all manifestation,
demonstration in Palestinia against the final solution practiced on Palestinians for 60 years ago.
What the terrorist (who would be Zarkaoui) says is too much a dialog of Satanists, of antichrist. It’s not normal for people who claim they act for
Muslims and Arabs. Some ideas in the text the chef read are really not Muslim’s ones but Satanist ones that a Muslim don’t care! Why do that text
glorifie America so much and discredit Islam fanatics so well?
What is that ring on a terrorist’s finger, isn’t it forbidden to wear jewels or expensive things for a fanatic Muslim.
montage? :
-13 :45 :59 During that second exactly, he is pulled back by the man who hold his harms, and the one who hold his legs, hold his legs under his knees
wich are maintained on the floor in order not to move. This give an impression of a “pelvis-move”. Some pictures are missing in that second and have
been put forward to give an impression of a natural quick “pelvis move” of struggle. Look at the number 9 in the hour. It also have a change I don’t
know why.
-14:46:00 We can hear in a non American accent : “Ok!”. Because the shot was good and the scene could continue.
The theory is that it was made to make the world vomit and vomit again cursing Iraqis for their anti-Christianity (antichrist symbol) and barbary. The
text is suspect, too sharpened to be free (frank), too demonstrative of insanity, of antichristy, of greatness of Freedom and America, but not
passionate) Nick Berg knew something that gave him the first part he didn’t suspect, as he was asked to take part to that “show” to get free. It is
his head witch is taken off and exhibited, but on his dead body. He was filmed on his own free in front false-terrorists, if it’s not a montage, witch
change nothing. We see the cut cutting him for the first time after the zoom (4:39 to 4:43). Look well, it’s the first real cutting of his throat, not
before at all! At 4:43, he is in another position, dead, yelling, moving only because of the man behind him and his head is cut off. The army needed
an “exemplary”, “confident”, victim, juste after the Abu Ghraib abuses!! There are still some 40 persons who have disappeared like him in Iraq at that
day.
"
) 
