It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
When SFPD went to the city for $33,000 for a third gun buyback scheduled for March, it provided the city with a list of information, including a list of the 92 people it owed money to from the first two gun buybacks. That information also included addresses and phone numbers along with what weapons the city bought from the person.
Then the Finance Department put that information in a packet for the Santa Fe City Council making it public record.
No names were to be taken and the gun owner would get $100 for rifles and shotguns, $150 for handguns and $200 for assault weapons.
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
That isn't a backfire....that is plausible deniability to any wrong doing on the city's part. I smell no "accident" here and it was intentional on their part.
Originally posted by Signals
reply to post by ownbestenemy
Agreed, doesn't seem like a "mistake", huh?
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
Originally posted by Signals
reply to post by ownbestenemy
Agreed, doesn't seem like a "mistake", huh?
Though makes one wonder if it is billed as anonymous...and the city asks you for a name and address....it really isn't anonymous is it? I mean, if it were truly anonymous, they would have no names to mistakenly put out.....the State is culpable but so are the people who freely gave their information in an "anonymous" buy back.
Originally posted by nothingwrong
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
Originally posted by Signals
reply to post by ownbestenemy
Agreed, doesn't seem like a "mistake", huh?
Though makes one wonder if it is billed as anonymous...and the city asks you for a name and address....it really isn't anonymous is it? I mean, if it were truly anonymous, they would have no names to mistakenly put out.....the State is culpable but so are the people who freely gave their information in an "anonymous" buy back.
This is a very good point! What sort of dip-wit goes to an anonymous event and does not question being asked for a name and address as soon as you get there?
"Oh, we keep you information anonymously" - this means nothing, but people believe it. People talk about dumbing down America - perhaps that plan is going better that anyone thought, huh?