posted on Mar, 7 2013 @ 08:18 PM
I suppose this is really about the acceptability of the spread of wealth and opportunities to different people: or our views on it. We see the spread
of these things very differently. I think this is because we are looking also at different parts of the spread. If you look at the distribution of
wealth we will mostlikely see an l shape: on a graph. Quite clearly the haves and have nots: most people falling into 1 group or the other. But most
of the power is in the very uppermost part and that is also a part of the problem. Couple this with a constitutional monarchy and what you get is a
very skewed country.
I have a plan.
But first are the problems.
1.If we all decide to get rids of the idea of a monarchy we would still have a big problem. The military and police swear an oath to the crown and not
the people. This means that the police/army would shoot the people to keep the royals in place.
2.Anything really really bad about the royals would be covered up. There are stories about things which here cannot be discussed for fear of
3. People do not like change.
Here is my solution
1. First we make it so anyone new who wants to join the military, police... swears an oath to the people. This would need to be given 50 years to
clear out all those who did not.
2. Then we move to the next stage. We make sure that all the really bad things the royals have done and are doing are publicized to a large degree.By
telling the truth people will want change.
3. If we did the last 2 stages at the same time we will now be ready in 50 years from starting 1. If not it may take 100 years. We then do what is
necessary to dissolve the monarchy.
Best case scenario 50 years by my reckoning. How do you like my solution?
edit on 7-3-2013 by werewolf99 because: (no reason given)