Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by sacgamer25
Scientific theories that contradict the Bible have far more evidence to support their validity than your Bible does. Additionally...
"Although there are scientific reasons for accepting a young earth, I am a young age creationist because that is my understanding of the
Scripture. As I shared with my professors years ago when I was in college, if all the evidence in the universe turns against creationism, I would be
the first to admit it, but I would still be a creationist because that is what the Word of God seems to indicate." - Kurt Wise, Harvard
Not to mention this little thing:
edit on 22-2-2013 by AfterInfinity because: (no reason given)
You are 100% wrong.
If 900 people believe the data says evolution and 100 believe the data says creation it does not imply there is more data for evolution.
Every single claim that has been made by evolution has been countered by creation scientists that provide an equally plausible explanation for
As long as creation scientist can continue to dispute evolution based on the exact same data, then we can be sure of at least one thing origins, age
of the earth, and evolution remain an assumptions and not facts.
Since we have 900 people providing data to support evolution and only 100 providing data to prove creation, of course we find more evidence for
evolution, should be at least 9-1 by my assumption.
Here is where "SCIENCE" stops working. Because the majority believe what they have been taught since grade school all of their work goes to proving
what they believe. When a creation science says hey wait a minute before you go making your claims we have an opposite and equally sound scientific
theory that refutes your claim of evolution. They are immediately classified crazy Christian.
Calling me crazy because I accept an alternate theory of which neither can be proven is not crazy, and is precisely what makes science so great.
What makes science so great is that in order for anything to be considered fact it not only has to happen once it has to be repeatable. And if even
one step of the work can be proven false than the entire theory collapses.
Currently we have 2 theories God and Evolution. It is absolutely imperative for the atheist mind to prove all religious text about God wrong.
Anyone who accepts Evolution at this current time in our understanding as a process that leads from a cingle cell to man is believing in the atheistic
view of religion. But still a religion none the less. The evolutionary theory provides a set of "natural laws" to determine the who, what, where,
and why. Trying to completely eliminate the spiritual.
In essence they are trying to eliminate sin and consequence by saying that it doesn't really exist. That what we see as sin is simply some moral
code that helps us move along in society. It is the absence of God from our naturalistic atheist views that lead to a society where anything and
everything is tolerable.
Because everything is natural.
No everything is created with a purpose and sin and death are real. But so is love, everlasting life and spirituality.