It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
More mars anomalies or just more rocks and shadows?
well i am convinced that there seems to be a shadow under the rod and im convinced that there is a prapellor. Maybe someone can post the pic,without highlighting the anomaly in the bottom right.
Originally posted by Chamberf=6
reply to post by symptomoftheuniverse
I see no shadow from what you call a white "rod". I think it's a glitch.
Also what the hell is a "propella"? Do you mean propeller?
Either way I saw nothing of interest besides rocks in the right corner.
Although I have a feeling you are convinced and no amount of disagreement with you will matter anyway.
edit on 2/22/2013 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)
the 3rd and 4th from the bottom are my favorites. I challange people to post images on earth with as many natural anomolies as what we have been seeing from curiosity. We humans will be humbled and nasa funding would sky rocket,archeologist would be aboard the first manned mission if these anomolies are real. Me personally is 70percent convinced of ancient advanced civilisation on mars.
Originally posted by Tardacus
All of the following pictures were cropped from this NASA panoramic image:
www.nasa.gov...
The cropped images have not been manipulated in any way.color, contrast, sharpness etc are all from the original NASA image found at the above link.
The cropped images have been enlarged in order to provide a better view.
In order to not prejudice or guide you in seeing something that may or may not be there I will not yet offer my opinion on any of the images.I am posting the images and will let them speak for themselves.
edit on 22-2-2013 by Tardacus because: (no reason given)edit on 22-2-2013 by Tardacus because: (no reason given)
You seem to not want an ancient civilisation on mars,i wonder why that is?
I challange people to post images on earth with as many natural anomolies as what we have been seeing from curiosity.
Originally posted by impaired
I see rocks and shadows.
And please know about the images before you make a thread and say they are unaltered.
Those images are white-balanced.
Edit - And folks aren't even looking at the 3D anaglyph versions. I mean, if you're going to say things are this or that, at least look at them in 3D.
Once you go 3D, you won't want to go back and you'll probably be VERY SURPRISED at what are just shadows and rocks.
www.edtruthan.com...edit on 2/22/2013 by impaired because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by symptomoftheuniverse
reply to post by Chamberf=6
[mor. Shame.
Originally posted by Tardacus
Originally posted by impaired
I see rocks and shadows.
And please know about the images before you make a thread and say they are unaltered.
Those images are white-balanced.
Edit - And folks aren't even looking at the 3D anaglyph versions. I mean, if you're going to say things are this or that, at least look at them in 3D.
Once you go 3D, you won't want to go back and you'll probably be VERY SURPRISED at what are just shadows and rocks.
www.edtruthan.com...edit on 2/22/2013 by impaired because: (no reason given)
I don`t have 3D glasses, I wish i did but i don`t. The original images weren`t white balanced or any other manipulation, they were cropped from the NASA panorama image and enlarged, that`s all.
Originally posted by MmmPie
Congrats.
This is the worst one of these threads I have seen, terrible pictures to boot.
There are plenty of images with better resolution that yu could try and convince people with. Talk about blurry! Good tactic though, use pictures that could be anything and say they're...anything.
Originally posted by impaired
Originally posted by Tardacus
Originally posted by impaired
I see rocks and shadows.
And please know about the images before you make a thread and say they are unaltered.
Those images are white-balanced.
Edit - And folks aren't even looking at the 3D anaglyph versions. I mean, if you're going to say things are this or that, at least look at them in 3D.
Once you go 3D, you won't want to go back and you'll probably be VERY SURPRISED at what are just shadows and rocks.
www.edtruthan.com...edit on 2/22/2013 by impaired because: (no reason given)
I don`t have 3D glasses, I wish i did but i don`t. The original images weren`t white balanced or any other manipulation, they were cropped from the NASA panorama image and enlarged, that`s all.
Yes they are white balanced. Take it from someone who creates mosaics and panoramas from the RAW images (Curiosity). Have you ever seen a raw image from Curiosity? It doesn't sound like it, because you would know:
mars.jpl.nasa.gov...
I know that NASA white-balances them (it's not exactly a secret), and I know a white-balanced Mars image when I see one.
And 3d glasses (anaglyph) are only about $3 USD. I recommend them to ANYONE who wants to look for Mars anomalies.
Looking for them in 2d is almost counterproductive.
And once again - they ARE white balanced. You want to bet, or do I have to do the research for you?
Deny ignorance.edit on 2/22/2013 by impaired because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Tardacus
well i don`t know what NASA does with the images so i can`t claim that they didn`t white balance them and I would never try to claim that.edit on 22-2-2013 by Tardacus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Tardacus
The original images weren`t white balanced or any other manipulation, they were cropped from the NASA panorama image and enlarged, that`s all.
Originally posted by Tardacus
The cropped images have not been manipulated in any way.color, contrast, sharpness etc are all from the original NASA image found at the above link.
so whats the point at looking at 2d?countr productive.have you seen images that are productive?
Originally posted by impaired
Originally posted by Tardacus
Originally posted by impaired
I see rocks and shadows.
And please know about the images before you make a thread and say they are unaltered.
Those images are white-balanced.
Edit - And folks aren't even looking at the 3D anaglyph versions. I mean, if you're going to say things are this or that, at least look at them in 3D.
Once you go 3D, you won't want to go back and you'll probably be VERY SURPRISED at what are just shadows and rocks.
www.edtruthan.com...edit on 2/22/2013 by impaired because: (no reason given)
I don`t have 3D glasses, I wish i did but i don`t. The original images weren`t white balanced or any other manipulation, they were cropped from the NASA panorama image and enlarged, that`s all.
Yes they are white balanced. Take it from someone who creates mosaics and panoramas from the RAW images (Curiosity). Have you ever seen a raw image from Curiosity? It doesn't sound like it, because you would know:
mars.jpl.nasa.gov...
I know that NASA white-balances them (it's not exactly a secret), and I know a white-balanced Mars image when I see one.
And 3d glasses (anaglyph) are only about $3 USD. I recommend them to ANYONE who wants to look for Mars anomalies.
Looking for them in 2d is almost counterproductive.
And once again - they ARE white balanced. You want to bet, or do I have to do the research for you?
Deny ignorance.edit on 2/22/2013 by impaired because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Tardacus
When NASA receives these images from the rover the images are in black and white.
After NASA receives the images they use color filters on the images to give them the colors that we see.
Lets look at the images the way NASA sees them when they are received from the rover.
Originally posted by ArMaP
The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.
Originally posted by Tardacus
When NASA receives these images from the rover the images are in black and white.
No, the images from Curiosity are colour images.
After NASA receives the images they use color filters on the images to give them the colors that we see.
No. Even with the older rovers (that did return monochromatic images) the colour images were not made by using colour filters, each monochromatic photo was from a specific wavelength, corresponding to a specific colour (or invisible light, like ultraviolet or infrared).
By joining three images from the filters corresponding to red, green and blue NASA (or anyone else, like me ) could make an RGB image.
Lets look at the images the way NASA sees them when they are received from the rover.
Not true.
As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.
Originally posted by Tardacus
Thank you for that info i didn`t know that.
I guess I shouldn`t believe everything I read on ATS, i don`t know anything about how they do the images I was repeating what i read on ATS about the images being black and white images.
This graphic shows the locations of the cameras on NASA's Curiosity rover. The rover's mast features seven cameras: the Remote Micro Imager, part of the Chemistry and Camera suite; four black-and-white Navigation Cameras (two on the left and two on the right) and two color Mast Cameras (Mastcams). Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech