"The Department Of Homeland Security Stole My Boat Today"

page: 2
11
<< 1   >>

log in

join

posted on Feb, 25 2013 @ 11:31 AM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 


Who was she working for?
Where does she get her directives?

The Government is 80% red tape and 10% circus dog and pony act.
Please......




posted on Feb, 25 2013 @ 04:06 PM
link   
reply to post by burntheships
 


You actually believe she went up the chain of command with this?

How far?

Why did he get his boat back the very next day if her orders came from the top?

Please...use some critical thought



posted on Feb, 25 2013 @ 04:14 PM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 





You actually believe she went up the chain of command with this?


Why would you presume I thought that?
Did I say that? No. Please, use some critical thought, rather than
leaps of nonsense.


What is apparent is she has a job with the DHS, and she made the decision,
That is simple enough, and the boat made way to the rightful owner due
to the sellers diligence, in spite of the lack of competence
by the employee.


edit on 25-2-2013 by burntheships because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 25 2013 @ 04:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by PsykoOps

Update to yesterday’s post. A day after Buddy was seized by DHS I now have my boat in my possession and at my slip.


Source

The coast guard "lady" messed up big time. But she got her joy ride out of it anyway so I doubt she'll care.


so you got it the next day....the problem is corrected in one day by having the builder make a phone call...i know this will sound insensitive....but, get over it...this crap happens all the time, in many different governmental offices, on many different levels. is it frustrating?...yeah? is it normal?... pretty damn close if it wasn't done exactly correct the first time.
have a beer, a shot, or a glass of some adult beverage, and relax...take it from someone that has had 2 heart attacks due to stress...it just not worth it...ok i'm done...sorry about the rant



posted on Feb, 25 2013 @ 04:22 PM
link   
reply to post by burntheships
 


She made the decision and she was wrong.

If she was told from higher up to confiscate the boat, the guy would be caught up in the red tape bs that you mentioned.

In this instance, the bloated governance stopped with her, this isn't an initiative from higher up.



posted on Feb, 25 2013 @ 04:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
this isn't an initiative from higher up.


I never said it was.

"Directives" are not initiatives from higher ups, they are standing
rules of operation. So are we done now/



posted on Feb, 25 2013 @ 04:36 PM
link   
OK I am going outside and pull the covers off my boat and let it get very dirty and give it a few scratches and just muss it up so it doesn't shine so pretty anymore. When I leave from the dock I will pretend to have problems with the motors.

I have had plenty of experience with boat motors and being stranded in the water or on a small island when I ran 17' ski boats in fresh water and the ocean.

Retired and bought a nice one that would not leave me high and in the water again.
But it is too pretty so must go undercover now. ta ta ta taaaaa


Love retirement.



posted on Feb, 25 2013 @ 06:15 PM
link   
reply to post by jimmyx
 


Not my boat. I'm not involved in the case in any other form except for this discussion. I just linked into the update.





new topics
top topics
 
11
<< 1   >>

log in

join