reply to post by JimOberg
Your Number 4 was a general question, one not directed at you personally, but one which you seemed to take personal. Probably because you have been
accused before on the internet of calling Cooper a liar.
“I normally refrain from labeling people "liars" unless they have a long track record of the sort of behavior that Jim Oberg routinely exhibits.
One can't routinely make the sort of "mistakes" that Oberg makes unless one is totally incompetent or deliberately lying.
Oberg has repeatedly insinuated that Cooper was a liar, fool, and/or mentally incompetent. Have you read his stuff? How can you possibly think Oberg
hasn't been attacking Cooper's honor in order to discredit Cooper's UFO stories? That is what Obeg does for a living or some perverse hobby.”
~ David Rudiak
Or how about this one:
“In a surprising development in the ongoing debate about Gordon Cooper's
recent statements on the subject of UFOs, NASA spokesperson James Oberg
has publically declared the famous astronaut a liar.
James Oberg, using unnamed sources, claims to have proof that Cooper is
lying about his UFO experiences. Clearly these unnamed sources should
come forward and help fuel the public debate on this controversial topic.
Strangely, while Oberg dangles his unnamed sources and backdoor rumours
as proof positive of Cooper's heinous efforts to manipulate the belief
systems of the American public by perpetuating the UFO myth, at the same
time he *embraces* any portions of Cooper's testimony which support his
How can this be? How can Oberg decry Cooper as a damnable liar deluding
the American public, yet embrace his testimony on every other topic?
Where are Oberg's unnamed sources? Where is the public debate? How has
Cooper responded to these charges?
Inquiring minds want to know......”
~ John Ratcliff
But let’s be clear here, in case you forgot. You do remember that I think you are a paid shill, paid by NASA and others to lie to us to support the
UFO cover up. I have no reason to trust anything you say concerning UFO related topics. So as far as I am concerned, ANY so called details or
“proof” you dig up could be fabricated.
Even if you did talk to all those people you claim you did, we have no idea what you wrote is really what they said. And why would they want to put
their jobs, pensions, etc on the chopping block by promoting that ~ yes, they did see a saucer shaped craft ~ after they were told to not talk about
Once again, the irony is not lost on us here, that you are supporting what pro ET McDonald says over one of your own NASA guys. Interesting light it
puts you in when one of your NASA guys goes rouge.