Govt taking more of my check in 2013. DId your taxes go up, too? Are you Rich?, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 27 times


reply posted on 21-2-2013 @ 09:21 AM by macman
reply to post by NavyDoc



Also, does anyone know how that "War on Poverty" is coming along?

With the massive amount of money that is taken from people for this, why is there anyone still in poverty?


Oh yeah, because it is Govt. And Govt is about as corrupt as it gets and will do what it wants.


reply posted on 21-2-2013 @ 09:48 AM by Chance321
reply to post by tovenar



Yup, my taxes went up lost $59. in my check and not rich by any means. So guess by obamas deffinition rich is anyone earning a pay check.


reply posted on 21-2-2013 @ 09:53 AM by jimmiec
reply to post by Crakeur



Ah reality. Here's reality. Raise taxes on the rich,corporations, etc, and prices go up. Raise gas prices and the poor pay that extra tax. It is simple math. How anyone can not see it is beyond comprehension. Trying to burden the wealthy always hurts the poor. As an example. Sanctions against Iran. The sanctions never touch the people in power, they hurt the poor and the pain never comes close to hurting the rich. It is just common sense.


reply posted on 21-2-2013 @ 10:07 AM by tovenar
News Flash: That was a tax increase.

A "temporary tax holiday" that lasted more than a decade? I have bad news for you: Obama says this economic malaise is also "temporary." I guess we have 8 years to go???

It was only as temporary or as permanent at Congress sets it. They can call it temporary, although it was renewed twice (by republican congresses....). And Obama told congress he wouldn't sign on to any legislation that "renewed" the decade long holiday. So yes, it's HIS to own.

This just in: The money doesn't even go into social security.

There is no little drawer at the IRS with your social security number on it. Congress spends all the money they take in "in the name of" social security. If SS still exists when you retire (assuming you retire in the next six years), you will be paid out of the general funds of the government.

So it wasn't something that "expired," like a beloved pet that died of old age. Congress has it's hand in your wallet, and Obama told them to dig a little deeper.


This I believe: I am the best decision maker when it comes to how my money should be spent. Not the Kenyan, not the Lizards in the capitol. Me. I give to charity--charities that I have researched, and looked at their financial documents, and at which I have volunteered, where they really feed the hungry with the food they collect.

What will congress use my hard-earned money for, that matters more than feeding my family so we can at least eat the evening meal together? They will spend it on a bridge to nowhere, a treadmill for shrimp, Obama's golf outing with Tiger Woods, or a press junket for Biden to tell me that the only gun I need is a $7000 shotgun.

I want to vote for the party that gives ME opportunity. The one where I get to make my own choices, where I am respected as the most knowledgeable, or at least most interested, defender of my interests. I want the opportunity to spend my own money, instead of having those woodpeckers spend it for me.


reply posted on 21-2-2013 @ 10:13 AM by Crakeur
reply to post by jimmiec



The sanctions are imposed, hoping that the government being sanctioned cares enough about its people that they will change their policy, or the people will over throw that government.

seems to me we're just talking about changes in the personal tax structure, not the corporate.

the tax system is deeply flawed. there should be more brackets. a man making $400,000 should be hit in the same manner as a man making $1,000,000 and he shouldn't pay the same rates as a guy making $5,000,000 and so on.

ask the NYC resident, making $400,000 how he likes paying 39.6% to the feds (not including the medicare surcharge on unearned income) and almost 12% to the state and city. he's bringing home about $160,000.
Yes, $160,000 sounds like a lot and, in some places it is, but not in high tax states, which is where the bulk of the so called working rich live.

The tax rates are unfair in a variety of ways and bemoaning a 2% increase in medicare which is used to benefit everyone and is needed to cover medical costs for those that cannot afford independent insurance, seems a bit ridiculous.

.


reply posted on 21-2-2013 @ 10:15 AM by jimmiec
reply to post by Crakeur



Spin it all you want. The result is that this administration is creating more poor people in mass.



reply posted on 21-2-2013 @ 10:19 AM by Crakeur
reply to post by jimmiec



I won't disagree on how the administration is doing but I think the blame falls on all in DC. this isn't just the white house. As much as I dislike Obama, he was handed a poop sandwich. He hasn't done much to help. Both Dems and Republicans have managed to make a bad situtation worse.


reply posted on 21-2-2013 @ 10:20 AM by leemachino
Originally posted by tovenar

News Flash: That was a tax increase.

A "temporary tax holiday" that lasted more than a decade? I have bad news for you: Obama says this economic malaise is also "temporary." I guess we have 8 years to go???

It was only as temporary or as permanent at Congress sets it. They can call it temporary, although it was renewed twice (by republican congresses....). And Obama told congress he wouldn't sign on to any legislation that "renewed" the decade long holiday. So yes, it's HIS to own.

This just in: The money doesn't even go into social security.

There is no little drawer at the IRS with your social security number on it. Congress spends all the money they take in "in the name of" social security. If SS still exists when you retire (assuming you retire in the next six years), you will be paid out of the general funds of the government.

So it wasn't something that "expired," like a beloved pet that died of old age. Congress has it's hand in your wallet, and Obama told them to dig a little deeper.


This I believe: I am the best decision maker when it comes to how my money should be spent. Not the Kenyan, not the Lizards in the capitol. Me. I give to charity--charities that I have researched, and looked at their financial documents, and at which I have volunteered, where they really feed the hungry with the food they collect.

What will congress use my hard-earned money for, that matters more than feeding my family so we can at least eat the evening meal together? They will spend it on a bridge to nowhere, a treadmill for shrimp, Obama's golf outing with Tiger Woods, or a press junket for Biden to tell me that the only gun I need is a $7000 shotgun.

I want to vote for the party that gives ME opportunity. The one where I get to make my own choices, where I am respected as the most knowledgeable, or at least most interested, defender of my interests. I want the opportunity to spend my own money, instead of having those woodpeckers spend it for me.


Those were the Bush tax cuts, not the payroll tax break that Obama implemented a few years ago.


reply posted on 21-2-2013 @ 10:46 AM by camaro68ss
Originally posted by leemachino
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by leemachino


I am ok with paying 2% more in hopes that the benefits I have paid into for the past 20 years might still be around when I may need them.


You really think it will be around for you when you are ready for SS?

That is alot of money to pay for just "hope".


Its not that much money. I do believe it will be around when it comes time for me to collect. Unless the gov gives it to the bankers.
If congress would lift the cap so everyone pays the same % instead of the first 100k+ being taxed there wouldnt even be a need for the tax break to expire.
Dont blame Obama, call your congress man or woman. They let it expire.


Im 26 and been paying into SS for 8 years. I will not see SS check when im 65 years old. Its not going to happen. The people that pay into vs those who collect starts to invert by 2018. So by 2018 there will be more people collecting SS then paying in it. He’s a solution. I opt out, the government can keep the 8 years I’ve paid into it and I wave any future collections when I’m 65.

I feel I can invest my money better than any government agency.

Your problem is your “hoping” the government doesn’t give your money to bankers. I say stop giving the government your retirement money in the first place.

Even worse, and this is from the CBO, Medicares CASH drys up by 2016! thats 3 years from now! Still trust the government with your money? We are all paying into it and wont see a dime. Classic Ponzi scheme and no one is talking about it!
edit on 21-2-2013 by camaro68ss because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



UN Proposes Tax On Americans for 3rd world countries
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
Armed bystander stops stabbing outside school
  Posted 12 days ago with 27 member flags
" Climate Change Is Not A Hoax", says Obama!!??
  Posted 4 days ago with 21 member flags
Former Arizona Sheriff Mack, ‘Gun Control Against the Law’
  Posted 13 days ago with 12 member flags
Limiting Freedom & It\'s Effects On Society
  Posted 17 days ago with 11 member flags