reply to post by nomnom
I agree with a good part of that. I'm about the farthest possible thing from an alarmist, however.
I realized that I was greatly oversimplifying the scenario even while typing that out - but I was on a roll and found it "good enough", heh.
Connecting the Georgia Guidestones was hasty, I admit, though it wasn't intended to be my evidence for a depopulation agenda - just a cherry on top.
Very wealthy people most certainly designed them, and everything about them strongly suggests Mystery School connections, but beyond that is just
speculation as you say.
Firstly, the structure of global politics has secret societies above elite thinktanks, which in turn heavily influence powerful elements in politics,
industry, finance, military, and media, which in turn influence the course of nations and progression of human society at large. While not a perfect
model, it is roughly accurate. Simply put, the influence of some secret societies should not be underestimated.
Secondly, there are not just one or two great agendas being seamlessly carried out by elites and so-on down the pyramid. There are many, represented
by the tens of thousands of people who represent the 'capstone'. A great poker game, with 'friendly' competition, with temporary alliances, faked
contentions, always-changing tactics to accommodate the always-changing landscape. The only golden rules being, don't rock the boat, and destroy
anyone who does. Some preach for a totalitarian society with everybody microchipped - a sort of Brave New World. While others preach for a so-called
Golden Age (which I believe is the more favored, based on personal investigations. It also is more sustainable, even self-regulating) where social
conditioning makes cooperation the norm.
I still firmly believe that one of the more powerful agendas, generally agreed upon by the whole poker table, is to greatly depopulate the planet. And
it's a near-certainty (for reasons I'd rather not get into) that a large-scale conflict is coming which will probably involve the USA and Russia.
The only thing I've really come up with myself in all of this, is connecting the coming global conflict with the elites' plans for depopulation. And
nuclear war is a basically-guaranteed method of accomplishing that. You're right though, there are probably much better ways of accomplishing the same
task. Especially if you take black projects into account. Nuclear explosives are 70-year-old technology. It would be dangerously naive to assume that
we haven't invented something more destructive with fewer "side effects".
If that makes sense =)
edit on 6-3-2013 by Son of Will because: (no reason given)