Kate Middleton designed by a committee and built by craftsmen , page 2


Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 20-2-2013 @ 11:02 AM by FreedomEntered
reply to post by screamandshout



Okay LEARN abit about Kate Middleton. Her mother is known as a " pushy" parent. Pushy parents usually like their children to either social climb or become famous by self-promotion.

Her family arent some innocent unknowing family. They made sure to make it possible for their daughter to pursue the prince. Although not " that rich" they bought her a 1 million apartment in London, this is before she even had to work. Then they employ her so that she doesnt have to get up in the morning, after university. You know like with real jobs you have to wake in the morning. Her family didnt want her to have that hassle whilst trying to " attain" the princes commitment

edit on 20-2-2013 by FreedomEntered because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 20-2-2013 @ 11:56 AM by HUMBLEONE
Originally posted by guanyu
Originally posted by HUMBLEONE
Her Physical attributes are quite exemplary.

I suppose as long as our standards of beauty are on who is willing to subject themselves to a subsistence diet and employ a personal stylist to purchase designer clothes and dress them for all occasions.

Her appearance is an issue because it's Stepford Wife. It's to fulfill an agenda. She's to be a "princess." That is, the silent and pretty support to her Man.

It's not the most feminist of ideology. And that's without even getting into the archaic institution of "royalty."

Surely the argument of many appears to be, "Come on guys, Kate's not so bad. She's kinda hot."

I'll honestly never understand monarchists.
edit on 20-2-2013 by guanyu because: (no reason given)


Feminism? You are dealing with diabolical interdimensionals who eat the grief, pain and suffering that they create. What does feminism have to do with it? I think we are WAY beyond our concerns for gender equity when dealing with the likes of DRACONIS. Royalty is just one absurd way that the Reptile formulates it's hierachical structure. I think it's rather ridiculous..funny hats, old men in silly soldier suits with swords hanging upon ancient scaly loins. Old bugger probably couldn't even lift the bloody thing. Don't get me started on organised religion! Thank you for your commentary. I like the cut of your jib!
edit on 20-2-2013 by HUMBLEONE because: Bolderdash and hogswill!



reply posted on 20-2-2013 @ 12:03 PM by FreedomEntered
reply to post by HUMBLEONE



They are saying shes a breeder. She is not there to use and utilize the space between her ears. And this is patriarchy. Charles married Diana who was also not the smartest lady on the block.

Dont you see a pattern. The men are able to keep control due to the fact that the women are less intelligent or appear to be so. HOWEVER, it backfires. Wait for it. If William slips up as Charles did it will hit him in the face so bad. Because these unintelligent ladies, fight like roughens. They air everything in public and they have no scrupples in getting what ever slander they need to out there about their known enemies.

Then the gloves are off and William will just dump her and lets hope she has security.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Amazing Bloodline - Mitt Romney Is Related To Obama & Bush
  Posted 2 days ago with 40 member flags
I have come to break the news to you..
  Posted 8 days ago with 18 member flags
No Longer To Serve and Protect
  Posted 17 days ago with 12 member flags
I beheld Satan falling as Baraq “O” Bamah
  Posted 13 days ago with 11 member flags
Chinese global government aspirations
  Posted 18 days ago with 8 member flags
The Power Behind the New World Order
  Posted 17 days ago with 8 member flags