posted on Feb, 19 2013 @ 08:44 AM
No doubt forum moderators have opinions as we all. But it is of questionalbe ethics when a mod starts a thread that has a decent video and trashes it
without any evidence other than offering that opinion labelled with the killer word "hoax."
Better he just left the thread alone for somebody else to start because more than likely it would have been on a neutral or positive note.
He speaks of "logical" reasons why a Sasquatch would not be caught napping. --He knows the parameters on that feat? Don't you just hate skeptics
that pull pure "logic" out of their hat where they have no other ammo?
Yes, we have many hoaxes in this field, with UFOs, and with fairies dancing in the meadows, but do skeptics never, never find themselves boxed in with
an accumulation of data that should convince them otherwise, or at best, keep them quiet?
The obvious answer is "NO!" Their have their conventional scientific-based egos to protect and that is more important than tons of collaborating
(My opinion on this matter is supported by a correlated, personal account related to the creatures.)