It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Arken
reply to post by impaired
To this one. www.unmannedspaceflight.com...
Originally posted by impaired
Originally posted by Arken
reply to post by impaired
To this one. www.unmannedspaceflight.com...
That's it.
Unmanned Spaceflight.com > Rules and Guidelines - Please Read
1.3 Astrobiology may not be discussed here, even in the context of a mission with those stated goals. This includes other banned topics such as SETI, "Red Rain," alien visitors, exobiology, biosignatures, microorganisms, fossils et cetera. (Amended 19Oct'12 / Updated 21Nov'12)
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by Arken
Except, those real bones were under the Earth for millions of years.
Your mars photos are on the surface....
....That makes them rocks. Fossils do not form on surface dirt. Bones turn to dust if they are exposed.
Originally posted by Waldy
reply to post by Arken
Come on! You know that your presentation is biased and made to support your claim with mind trickery.
Originally posted by Waldy
reply to post by Arken
Im not trying to get into an argument about this. Just wanted to point out the lack of scientific method in this post. It is leading and made for those that want to believe. Its only rearranged pixels of a planetary surface and should not be presented as a proof for anything. The op is missing the original data and a disclaimer!
There is not much of critical thinking going on in this topic.
Originally posted by Waldy
reply to post by Arken
Just wanted to point out the lack of scientific method in this post. It is leading and made for those that want to believe. Its only rearranged pixels of a planetary surface and should not be presented as a proof for anything. The op is missing the original data and a disclaimer!
Originally posted by Waldy
There is not much of critical thinking going on in this topic.
Originally posted by papajake
Mind trickery, sort of like how the original photos are over-saturated with reds and yellows which gives them the illusion that everything is blended together?
Originally posted by ArMaP
The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.
Originally posted by papajake
Mind trickery, sort of like how the original photos are over-saturated with reds and yellows which gives them the illusion that everything is blended together?
Only if you have badly regulated monitor, it doesn't look like "everything is blended together".
As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.
Originally posted by papajake
That's true. I did overstate the "everything" part. But to illustrate my point, here's a photo that I desaturated, which looks a lot more natural to me.
Originally posted by papajake
PS: did you also changed the contrast?"
No, just de-satutation.
Bollocks you did,
Originally posted by smirkley
(dont know where all my uploaded images went on that thread, they were stored on ATS servers)
Back then,.. nobody it seems could fathom there might be water there, now we know better.
So hang in there, time will tell.