It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CodeRed3D
Unfortunately, I see a payoff to the judge and a lot of valid reasons to dismiss the evidence. That said, it is never-the-less ingenious. I specially appreciated the slant on the accusation that BBC is aiding and embedding terrorists by covering up evidence that could lead to the apprehension of more parties involved with the 9/11 incident.
Originally posted by karen61560
reply to post by hellobruce
That would be relevant if the towers were made from cardboard boxes but alas they were not. Too bad, so many lives could have been spared it a box fell on them and not tons of concrete and steal.edit on 20-2-2013 by karen61560 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by GenRadek
reply to post by Flatcoat
This is just oversimplification of the event. if you wish to take such an example as fact, then by all means I suppose if I threw a bullet at you, that would mean a bullet cannot hurt you either correct? Or if i drive a car into a wall at 1 mph then that means brick walls cannot hurt my car? Or if I threw a bird at a plane, it will not harm the plane at all?
Agreed.
Originally posted by GenRadek
reply to post by grainofsand
This whole thread was doomed from the start.