reply to post by Grimpachi
I have not seen hardly any of those attributes used by the Sandy Hookers….
So, before an intelligent or frankly, what I already know will be an unintelligent thought is typed out, you have already labeled not only me but
every single person that has any doubt about the multiple official stories concerning Sandy Hook. An antiquated and weak attempt at discredit before
the argument even begins.
Well I disagree there. I used to jump in once in a while when someone thought they found a hole but what it had always turned out to be was that that
person simply didn’t use logic or they read into a situation but it wasn’t a hole. For example they were going on about how Lanza's body was given
to his father for burial or cremation yet a week later they were testing for one thing or another.
Well, I don't know. What about the reports that Lanza killed his father, that he was reported dead?
5:30 ET Update: Federal law enforcement officials tell Fox News that the father of Adam and Ryan Lanza was not killed, and will meet with authorities.
Officials also confirm the mother was found dead at her Connecticut home.
Why exactly was Lanza's father reported dead? Who relayed this information, who reported it? Is this not a hole somehow? Do you consider this a non
issue from the same media you claim I should believe explicitly when it suites your claims?
Those Sandy Hookers were going on and on about how they lied and still have the body. It was just there poor reading comprehension. Nowhere in the
articles did it say they still had his body. They did have blood work. I have zero faith in the Sandy Hookers and there “investigative skills”
common sense is sorely lacking with that group.
My reading comprehension is just fine. How about the Newtown Bee, asserting, publishing and later retracting fictitious accounts of the heroism of the
Sandy Hook principle that was later reported as deceased. A quiet retraction I may add as they refused to even acknowledge their mistake, or how it
was made in the first place.
How about the same source later stating that one of the people fleeing from police into the woods was an off duty, armed tactical officer from a
neighboring community who happened to be wearing pretty much the same exact thing as Lanza and happened to be at the school the exact same time as the
shooting? Is that my reading comprehension that fails me? Is that me mis understanding the facts? Has anyone, officials or otherwise elaborated on
this aspect? Let me help you, the answer is no.
Don't talk to me about common sense until you can spew forth an answer for that.
Several of them are so dense I don’t know how they tie their shoes by themselves. The instance I gave above was one of the more intelligent
mysteries they couldn’t solve on their own.
Not only are you incapable of answering any of the real questions about this incident, you are entirely inept to defend the OS. It's like Alex Jones
defending my second amendment rights. I't just isn't right.
There are a few people questioning the tragedy that have common sense but they are few and far between but they do exist.
There are around 20 million people questioning the events of Sandy Hook. A lot more people than watch CNN on a nightly basis. How many of them can
intelligently argue the conversations and points of interest in dispute of the OS? Well, that is your best guess. Mine would be about as many as can
intelligently argue for it.
If you have ever made a statement where you think the OS is a lie then you can count yourself out of the sensible minority. The smart Sandy Hookers
know to wait until the investigation is done before questioning its validity. If that needs further explaining then you are not in that group.
You say a lot, you prescribe morality and sensibility in large doses yet you never actually enlighten me or anyone else on those little parts of the
story we just can't get right, do you? Oh, I'll wait, with baited breath. Do you think after the investigation is finished, they can explain the 6
kids at Rosens house? I hope you say you do.
have already been told that the Sandy Hookers are the trailer park of the conspiracy community which made me entertain the thought of doing some Jeff
Foxworthy style jokes about them however I simply do not have the time and it is a subject I have been distancing myself from for a while.
You've got a little Piers Morgan in you, don't ya? If you can't defend the argument, attack the people. Stand on the graves of dead children and
assert that anyone who doesn't agree is less a person than you are. Pathetic.
edit on 19-2-2013 by Helious because: (no reason given)