Originally posted by jude11
Still looks like it's not going to be accepted as they want it to. The truth will come out slowly but surely.
I applaud the ATS stand on Sandy Hook and re-iterate that kids died and people were traumatized. And please don't post anything otherwise here...
ta.
You applaud ATS but don't want people who question the Official story to post here? This is ATS and we look for truth regardless of who it might
offend.
Thanks OP. 
Peace
edit on 18-2-2013 by jude11 because: (no reason given)
Agreed.
And in reality, 'ATS' isn't what is being applauded, it's the minority of members with the foresight and backbone to acknowledge the terrifying
reality that Government's around the world, including those that kill millions of foreign peasants in order to 'free them from tyranny' (is dead
free from tyranny? I suppose it is), has orchestrated the murder of it's own citizens, including children, in the fairly recent past.
It goes without saying that should a Government demonstrate similar twisted logic, they wouldn't have a problem carrying out such murders
again...seeing as the Government of the USA have even 'legalised' the murder of their own citizens in recent years, for God's sake!
As far as ATS goes, it's in direct conflict of it's mantra 'Deny Ignorance' and it's mission statements of digging out the truth, shining a light
in the darkness, etc. to curtail or forbid members from speculating about particular aspects of subjects or using phrases or questions that the
management feel probably would cause distress of upset those affected by a tragedy, or are otherwise distasteful.
Consider a rape case, or a murder case intended to go to trial...in order to arrive at justice for the victim, is there not a protracted and
pronounced sequence of events that are distasteful, upsetting and that cause extreme distress to victim in search of the truth of the case?
Isn't it the case, that in order to 'deny ignorance' or get at the truth, the difficult, distressing and often time very distasteful questions HAVE
to be asked and speculated upon, regardless of upset?
The obvious answer is of course. Until such time where we can wave a magic wand and get at the truth, this is ALWAYS going to be the way things are
done..if justice is to be done..always.
Justice and truth are paramount, despite distress caused by the difficult questions and conversations that are essential to achieving that justice. To
deny the difficult conversations and speculations, however distasteful that may be, runs the real risk of denying both Justice and ignorance.
Just my opinion, i realise the ATS management has the right to enforce it's own ideas of the balance between what it sees as common decency and
searching for truth of matters.
