It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The reason i was charged with a felony is because the victim had his cheek bone break.
Originally posted by Gadeff
The laws are put into effect by people who don't want a black eye or a broken cheek bone. They come into effect around people who are non-confrontational and quite passive. The common thought behind your situation is instead of breaking someones face you should have let law enforcement deal with it, and if they cannot handle it, you push the case to the higher-up jurisdiction. There are no words which will make you feel better, the system is not human and is pretty cut throat, there are no stones left unturned.
I'm not sorry for your punishment, because no one would be sorry for me if I were in your shoes. I could have been many times and I opted out. I took the passive "pussy" approach and the way it sits today, I have my rights and I don't get treated like # when I get pulled over. It's hard to live like a non-barbarian, and you end up looking like a pussy in social situations. Let me be the first to say, you can call me a pussy in front of a group of hot chicks because I didn't break your cheekbone, but I'll be sleeping tight with my guns and my security and my money because I didn't need to lash out violently to prove a point to save face in a social situation.
If I need to lash out violently to save someone from being seriously injured, there would be no problem for law enforcement to write the report out accordingly. Unless I'm somewhere I shouldn't be and racist witnesses are making false reports, during which LEO can usually tell the difference and write the report out well anyway.
Cheers, you're already a dangerous man, what do you need guns for?
Originally posted by psychonautical
reply to post by something wicked
We are all victims to a tyrannical govt/judicial system. Either fear the man, or fight the man. If you do not fight to keep your rights you do not deserve them in the first place.
Live in fear. Take your punishment. Be a good sheeple.
Originally posted by onequestion
reply to post by smurfy
You didnt read enough of the thread.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by Blarneystoner
If a person is truly a violent criminal, they will have a gun regardless.
In any even, "The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" is pretty clear. A felon has every right to protect him/herself as any other person. If you have a right to live, you have a right to protect that life.edit on 18-2-2013 by bigfatfurrytexan because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by onequestion
So there are so many posts and replys i cant get to all of them but i will try and address a few issues that seem to be popping up a lot.
First off im not looking for empathy i know what i did and i probably not only deserved some sort of punishment but needed it. Having said that do i think i need to be punished for the rest of my life? No... Would i shoot someone if i had a gun? If they were robbing my house that would be the only situation i would be in that i would have a gun on me and yes i would if the situation called for it.
To the people who think getting into a fist fight is such a big deal i think your overeacting, as a metter of fact i think you should get into one just for the experience. Please take that the right way.
I wrote this thread out of frustration because i cant go hunting with my brother and a few other family members and yea thats a big deal to me, if you cant relate then thats due to your lack of empathy.
I wanted the subject matter to not be about my case specifically but i used my case as a catalyst for discussion. I want to discuss what people think and what the laws are regarding this issue and a lot of the discussion has been really good.
I really appreciate everyones input and ive been following the thread closely. My schedule is busy, really busy untill the weekend but im going to pay attention as closesly as possible.
Thanks ATS.
Originally posted by Creep Thumper
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan
I don't know who the hell you think you are that you presume to lecture to me about what you think I should expect of myself.
You should be examining your own household. You've got bigger problems than I will ever have.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by something wicked
I have four family members who worked for the DOJ in a federal prison. I am very open in my disdain for the job they do. Whihle i love my family, I have a complete lack of respect for their willingness to impose tyranny on other humans.
ETA: the maority of prisoners in local prisons are drug offenders.edit on 19-2-2013 by bigfatfurrytexan because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by something wicked
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by something wicked
I have four family members who worked for the DOJ in a federal prison. I am very open in my disdain for the job they do. Whihle i love my family, I have a complete lack of respect for their willingness to impose tyranny on other humans.
ETA: the maority of prisoners in local prisons are drug offenders.edit on 19-2-2013 by bigfatfurrytexan because: (no reason given)
Those are very interesting comments. Are you implying that jailing people for offences that are considered to be worthy of a custodial sentence is a sign of tyranny? Or is it how (you imply) your family members treat those in jail as tyranny?
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Originally posted by something wicked
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by something wicked
I have four family members who worked for the DOJ in a federal prison. I am very open in my disdain for the job they do. Whihle i love my family, I have a complete lack of respect for their willingness to impose tyranny on other humans.
ETA: the maority of prisoners in local prisons are drug offenders.edit on 19-2-2013 by bigfatfurrytexan because: (no reason given)
Those are very interesting comments. Are you implying that jailing people for offences that are considered to be worthy of a custodial sentence is a sign of tyranny? Or is it how (you imply) your family members treat those in jail as tyranny?
To incarcerate someone for trucking pot across the state....that is tyranny. No, i don't smoke the stuff. But why should I be the one telling someone not to?
This accounts for about 40% of the inmates in the local prisons.