It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Again, this is not about the 'correct' way to practice/interpret Buddhism. This is about religious tolerance, and discriminating against a Buddhist because that person is not practicing it 'correctly' is not religious tolerance.
What absolute idiots Khameni and his flunkies are which such acts, only proving their ignorances, stupidity and misused religious inferiority if not insecurites.
Originally posted by Kram09
I was merely remarking upon the pattern of the OP's threads.
Originally posted by Kram09
I question the OP's motives and I'm skeptical about the professed desire for religious freedom in Iran.
Originally posted by superman2012
That's why, in my opinion all organized religions, not peoples personal beliefs, are evil.
But yes, Iranians should have religious freedoms. But often times points are brought up about Iran which have a strong element of hypocrisy considering U.S. actions and policy towards other such regimes in the region.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
(Although I might give the wiccans a free pass on that. 'harm ye none'. The only 'organized' religion out there that, as far as I know, is totally peaceful )
Jainism, traditionally known as Jaina dharma, is an Indian religion that prescribes a path of non-violence towards all living beings. It is one of the oldest religions of the world finding its roots in ancient India. Tradition says that this belief has been preached by a succession of twenty-four propagators of faith known as tirthankara. Jainism emphasises spiritual independence and equality between all forms of life. Practitioners of this religion believe that non-violence and self-control is the means by which they can obtain liberation from the cycle of reincarnations.
Originally posted by mideast
Originally posted by FlyersFan
We've had Iranian government puppets on this site previously.
I'm sure it won't be the last time.
I am 100% sure that the only one who can help a deluded person is himself.
You think that you are that important ? That some Iranian is putting time and effort to convince you ?
Think again.
I will not respond to you posts as much as it is needed.
Internet censorship in Iran has been increasing. In the first few years of the 21st century, Iran experienced a great surge in Internet usage, and, with 20 million people on the Internet, currently has the second highest percentage of its population online in the Middle East, after Israel.[1] When initially introduced, the Internet services provided by the government within Iran were comparatively open.
The software effectively blocks access to most pornographic sites, gay and lesbian sites, reformist political sites, news media, sites that provide tools to help users cloak their Internet identity, and other sites nebulously defined as immoral on various grounds.
Iran has been accused by its critics of censoring more Internet sites than any other nation except China.
According to the American newspaper Washington Times, Iran is using lawful intercept capabilities of telecommunications system to monitor communications by political dissidents on the Internet.
Internet censorship in Iran
Originally posted by yuppa
Originally posted by mideast
Originally posted by FlyersFan
We've had Iranian government puppets on this site previously.
I'm sure it won't be the last time.
I am 100% sure that the only one who can help a deluded person is himself.
You think that you are that important ? That some Iranian is putting time and effort to convince you ?
Think again.
I will not respond to you posts as much as it is needed.
In Iran there is only a certain amount of people allowed to use the internet. They have to be of the party faithful or be heavily monitored. Also they tend to go along and check after them to make sure they are not speaking badly against the homeland as well. It does not surprise me to see iranians defending them. It must really suck to be monitored and having to bite their tongues for those who are allowed to use the net.edit on 19-2-2013 by yuppa because: changed soem type
Originally posted by DarknStormy
I think people are not understanding whats going on here.
Muslims are buying these statues to use as decorations in their homes and have nothing to do with the teachings of Buddhism. To me, this is not a violation of religious freedom. In other words. If people were converting to Buddhism and the Iranian government started confiscating the statues then maybe there would be a valid argument here. This could be compared to a Western Government banning Garden Gnomes simply because religion or philosophy does not come into the equation in this case... How many of those Muslims do you think would be learning Buddhism? None.edit on 19-2-2013 by DarknStormy because: (no reason given)
But I am sure in the country where you live they allow the most ignorant to access the internet.
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by mideast
But I am sure in the country where you live they allow the most ignorant to access the internet.
I would wish every country to allow their most ignorant people to access the Internet.......
If not for freedom, a chance the Internet could provide a way of educating the ignorant.