Cantor: children of illegal immigrants should get U.S. citizenship, page


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times
Topic started on 17-2-2013 @ 02:12 AM by ollncasino
Eric Cantor, a top Republican lawmaker, has stated that he would grant citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants, a concept he has previously opposed.

"The best place to begin, I think, is with the children. Let's go ahead and get that under our belt, put a win on the board," Cantor said on NBC's "Meet the Press."

President Barack Obama has made immigration reform a top priority of his second term in office and a bipartisan group of senators is working to draft legislation that would tackle the issue in a comprehensive manner, rather than the piecemeal approach that Cantor suggested.

Republican Senator John McCain, who is involved in that effort, said his group aims to provide a path to citizenship for all of those who are in the United States illegally, not just children, as long as border security is tightened.

Yahoo News


Republicans are arguably afraid that if they don't reach out to the Latino community, by supporting immigration reform, they are destined for election irrelevancy.

Taking a less partisan point of view, when people become citizens they then take on the rights and duties of a citizen, including paying taxes. It is also true that the USA needs more people if it is to successfully compete with China's 1.3 billion people in the 21st century. A similar logic is permitting the high levels of immigration into Western Europe.

If I am not mistaken, the USA already operates a citizenship program for illegal immigrant children if they are academically gifted.

Cantor refused to state whether he would support immigration amnesty for adults as well.



edit on 17-2-2013 by ollncasino because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 17-2-2013 @ 02:51 AM by GRS1234
reply to post by ollncasino



i thought if your born in the US your automatically a us citizen what change happend that i wasnt aware of?


EDIT sorry im not that political
edit on 17-2-2013 by GRS1234 because: position stance

Pages:     ^^TOP^^