reply to post by tothetenthpower
I see what the other posters are saying. Installing something before it's been vetted seems like a waste of money, allocated or not. My real
question is did someone specifically ask for the cameras, or did DHS just send a check and tell them what to use it for. I would think that someone
petitioned the DHS for the money and had to state specifically what the money was to be used for, and that's the person or committee I think should
have taken a step back and spoken with the ACLU, the public and other city officials first. Then again were I in that position I would be trying to
get my grubby little hands on as many resources as possible for my area of jurisdiction.
I agree with you about WA tenth. I'm actually quite proud of a number of things that are going on in the state recently. Gay marriage, legalization
of something that is not to be named, the ban on suppressors being lifted, reigning in the SPD... Good time to live in this state. Perhaps our
politicians are starting to 'get it'. The residents too.