It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by woodwardjnr
reply to post by seabag
We never had the Wild West period like you guys. It's the Wild West mentality that lives on in America. Guns were never deemed as the essential tool Americans did. Massive cultural differences between our two nations. In fact we should be walking around with bow and arrows, to more reflect our cultural history with weapons.
I'm sure our perspectives would differ had we been born in each others respective nationsedit on 16-2-2013 by woodwardjnr because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by liverlad
Haha, maybe America should of thoght about that when they decided to stick their nose in everyone elses business. This is the modern world, and when such a big nation like America has very outdated gun laws, it is going to cause a lot of headlines around the world.
The problem with part of what you have stated is along the lines of deranged people getting their hands on guns. When it comes to these mass shootings many of the killers were fairly normal and they would come across to those who knew them as anything but deranged.
Originally posted by AlexIR
reply to post by seabag
Please tell me you're kidding, this is a joke and you're just having a laugh with us.
If now i must tell you that you are a person who has some problems.
A gun is a tool for killing not a killer, and is the most effective killing tool out there at the moment. There are deranged people who use these 'tools' to kill people for no good reason and the most logical way for a government to reduce the risk is to highly regulate these 'tools' and hope it will become difficult for deranged people to get hold of one and start shooting.
For the explanation you gave in the OP i have no words, i mean there are two images that came to mind after finishing and i hope you're not offended but this was my interpretation: a redneck sitting in his southern home looking at his gun while typing on a computer and a trailer trash that was looking at his gun, afraid that the feds will burst in and take it which will prove that this was all a conspiracy.
you stated that a person is 4.5 time more likely to get shot if they are carrying a gun. What is your basis for this?
Most of us are aware of studies that show that having a firearm in the home increases rather than decreases your chance of violent injury or death — usually through accidents or suicide. I was not aware of this peer-reviewed 2009 study by the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine study which concluded that people in possession of a gun were 4.5 times more likely to be shot during an assault than those who didn’t have a firearm….
Actually at first when the CHINESE invented explosive powder it was created for get this FIREWORKS.... The powder was put into specially made cannons to shoot bright breathtaking light shows in the sky... They are now called mortar shots.. It was not for years later that it was discovered they could shoot projectiles out of these cannons AT people to kill. What everyone thinks the history of guns has been a hellish kill em' up death machine created for killing ARE WRONG...
Originally posted by cornucopia
my brain tells me that a gun can/does kill life, that's why they were created.
Fireworks not guns
Fireworks were invented in ancient China in the 10th century to scare away evil spirits. Fireworks are generally classified as to where they perform, either as a ground or aerial firework. In the latter case they may provide their own propulsion (skyrocket) or be shot into the air by a mortar (aerial shell). The most common feature of fireworks is a paper or pasteboard tube or casing filled with the combustible material, often pyrotechnic stars. A number of these tubes or cases are often combined so as to make, when kindled, a great variety of sparkling shapes, often variously colored.
Originally posted by MisterFister103
If I were to decide tomorrow that I want to go out and kill as many people in a movie theater as I could. I take a baseball bat into the theater, I might be able to kill one, and everyone just thinks I'm some nut that snapped and we count our blessings that I didn't have a more powerful means of death. I am a minor footnote at the end of a newscast. If I take in a gun of some sort, I'd probably be able to pop 20+ people and I'm all over the news for the next week.
This debate is beyond stupid, and I'm tired of people like the OP making empty points.
Originally posted by Mike.Ockizard
reply to post by seabag
Guns dont kill people. People with guns kill people sometimes. Sometimes people with guns dont kill people. And sometimes people with guns kill animals. Pretty simple IMO.
Originally posted by MisterFister103
If I were to decide tomorrow that I want to go out and kill as many people in a movie theater as I could. I take a baseball bat into the theater, I might be able to kill one, and everyone just thinks I'm some nut that snapped and we count our blessings that I didn't have a more powerful means of death. I am a minor footnote at the end of a newscast. If I take in a gun of some sort, I'd probably be able to pop 20+ people and I'm all over the news for the next week.
This debate is beyond stupid, and I'm tired of people like the OP making empty points.
Originally posted by ChesterJohn
If you will go to this thread you will run across a poster zonetripper2065 who thinks that men are just animals and that they are just acting on instinct as such.
I dont agree but if we teach and program our kids from cradle to grave that they are just evolved animals, violent type of people will engendered into society animals.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
edit on 18-2-2013 by ChesterJohn because: (no reason given)
It seems to be a common argument by the pro gun fraternity that guns are needed for protection.
But you wouldn't need protection if the police were doing their job.
Why don't you lobby the White House, or your state govt (I don't know how it works over there) for better policing?
If I were to decide tomorrow that I want to go out and kill as many people in a movie theater as I could. I take a baseball bat into the theater, I might be able to kill one, and everyone just thinks I'm some nut that snapped and we count our blessings that I didn't have a more powerful means of death. I am a minor footnote at the end of a newscast. If I take in a gun of some sort, I'd probably be able to pop 20+ people and I'm all over the news for the next week.
This debate is beyond stupid, and I'm tired of people like the OP making empty points.
GUNS dont Kill people nor do the Operators. Bullets kill people
TRUTH...
difficult for some to see, lol
Originally posted by seabag
Take a listen to one of the best arguments against gun control I’ve ever heard.