It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wifibrains
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13
This was exactly what I was trying to stir up, why do you think science denies this theory?
I think it has a lot to do with the way everything is compartmentalised and given its own area of study, the "specialist" fails to look outside of their degree.
Originally posted by GRS1234
but wifi i mean can you blame em? i cant lol....edit on 19-2-2013 by GRS1234 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Wifibrains
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13
This theory would hypothesise that earth is sentient and intelligent. Science tends to go along with Darwinian evolution and natural selection. Like nature just keeps trying multiple ways and the best ways survive the test of time. I don't deny that as a process, but think there is more to the inteligence side. Possibly naturally spiritually.
Why is mainstream science convinced it is trail and error and accident? I think I know the answer anyhow. Its to do with what can be proven. Science likes to be able to doc its facts. If it can't be sampled and tested in a tube or witnessed, they won't toutch it.
If earth can be found to be sentient and intelligent, then the whole of the cosmos is an intelligent being in itself, is it not? Electromagnetism...
Originally posted by misscurious
Whether plants have a consciousness or not.. the answer to your question is they evolved... that's how they came to have these defense mechanisms..