It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by backcase
Funny, because I AM too. Some people just can't make that connection for some reason, it's so simple.
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by NOTurTypical
You may want to look at verse 34 as well. Why didn't you include it too?
John 10
34 Jesus answered them, “Is it not written in your Law, ‘I have said you are “gods”’?
Why do you assume I blaspheme when I say the same as Jesus? You are rejecting me just as they rejected Jesus.
I AM, and so are you.edit on 20-2-2013 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Have you read them ? Or have you just read what the Globalist wrote about them ?
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by NOTurTypical
So when Moses was on top of that mountain by himself, he couldn't have been talking to himself? What if Moses WAS talking to himself? That would explain why God would call himself I AM, wouldn't it?
Maybe you have been spoon fed the wrong context?
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by backcase
You are the Son that holds the true light of god. The true light of god is within all of us, your vision/sight/consciousness is proof of this. Pure light (God) is what helps you to perceive the world, it is the light that you see with and the light that makes you you.
The holy spirit (consciousness) is what makes you have "eyes to see". Unfortunately for you, you see the light but you do not comprehend it. Why? Because of Paul's teachings. His teachings are there to separate you from god, not bring you closer to him. By believing Paul's words, you are separating yourself from God, believing Jesus was him and no one else. That is not true at all, we are all One with God, not just Jesus.
Also, the resurrection is not what you think it is. When we die, we are resurrected through reincarnation, this is the resurrection Jesus was talking about, not him dying for three days then coming back. We are all the resurrection, because in order for you to be in the body you are in now, you had to die in another life to be born back into this one.
THAT'S the true resurrection, not Paul's version. What does it take to actually believe in reincarnation? Faith.
edit on 20-2-2013 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)
Acts 20
9 Seated in a window was a young man named Eutychus, who was sinking into a deep sleep as Paul talked on and on. When he was sound asleep, he fell to the ground from the third story and was picked up dead. 10 Paul went down, threw himself on the young man and put his arms around him. “Don’t be alarmed,” he said. “He’s alive!” 11 Then he went upstairs again and broke bread and ate. After talking until daylight, he left. 12 The people took the young man home alive and were greatly comforted.
So here it is at last. The reason for your dissimulation of Paul and Jesus. In Pauls case it must be his words..."it is appointed to men once to dies and then be judged".
"Truly, I tell all of you emphatically, whoever hears what I say and believes in the one who sent me has eternal life and will not be judged, but has passed from death to life.
8 The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit.
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
This is going to be a short post, but I think it will get some people thinking.... maybe.
Most Christians claim that Paul couldn't have been a fraud because his words seem inspired by the holy spirit. What most forget though, is that Paul rounded up followers of Jesus and killed them by the hundreds before his conversion and epistles.
Since Paul murdered followers of Jesus, wouldn't it be safe to assume that he would have also found teachings of Jesus among these followers that he killed? If he did, then wouldn't it be safe to assume that he could have plagiarized Jesus' words and called them his own in order to LOOK holy when he really wasn't?
What say you fellow ATS'ers?
Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by NOTurTypical
So the answer is NO and you don't care enough to do research and actually know what you are talking about . Thats exactly what they figured .
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by NOTurTypical
I wasn't aware Moses ever mentioned Jesus by name. And either way, Jesus was Moses just as I am you and you are me.
I have a question for you. Since god is all-powerful and omnipresent, wouldn't he have the ability to perceive himself from many different perspectives? Or is that out of god's reach?