It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by NOTurTypical
I also remember you saying that Acts was an affidavit for Paul and his trial. If it actually was an affidavit, why doesn't Saul/Paul come into the picture until at the very end of chapter 7? Strange that the court needed information about some of Peter's journeys in Paul's trials don't you think? What was the purpose of the first 7 chapters in Acts if it was only an affidavit for Paul?
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by NOTurTypical
That's why he founded the church along with Peter, right? He wrote the book on Christianity, the doctrine that all churches follow! How exactly didn't he create Christianity?
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Christianity wasn't a religion until Paul came into the picture. The message Paul taught is nothing like that of Jesus. Why do you defend a guy who created what you hate?
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by NOTurTypical
You realize that the Gospel of Luke and Acts were most likely one work split into two, both written at the same time, right?
As I said, Christianity didn't turn into a religion until Paul came into the picture.
Sure, Jews wouldn't spread Jesus' gospel.... unless of course it was Paul, then they would.
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by NOTurTypical
So why was Jesus' gospel written along with what you consider an affidavit? Jesus' ministry has nothing to do with what Paul did or didn't do. The trial was about Paul, not Jesus.