Tank at Hanford [WA state] Leaking Radioactive Liquid, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 26 times
Topic started on 15-2-2013 @ 03:32 PM by kalunom

Tank at Hanford [WA state] Leaking Radioactive Liquid


www.king5.com
The U.S. Department of Energy has determined one of the single-shell tanks storing radioactive waste at Hanford is leaking around 150 to 300 gallons of liquid per year.

DOE officials have not determined the cause of the leak.
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.tvw.org
articles.latimes.com


reply posted on 15-2-2013 @ 06:27 PM by Witness2008
reply to post by kalunom



Hanford has been leaking for years, since 1996 at least. I worked for an organization based in Seattle that had been taking Ariel photos of a stream of waste making it's way toward the Columbia basin. The attorneys I worked for that had been trying to hold the feds responsible got no where, and nothing happened after GE was awarded the management contract. I doubt anything will happen now.


reply posted on 15-2-2013 @ 07:22 PM by kalunom
Looking around a bit for more info on Hanford I found this site:

hanfordchallenge.org

It includes a list of news articles relating to Hanford dating back to January of 2010. Many interesting, and disturbing, reads. I had no idea until today that this place even existed.

One of the links goes to a .pdf showing 10 facts that may change the way you think about Hanford. I strongly suggest reading that.

A couple of examples from that .pdf:

4. Hanford’s reactors pumped billions of gallons of radioactive water into the Columbia River making it the “hottest” river in the world during production. Over one and a half trillion gallons of contaminated liquids were also dumped directly into the soil, equivalent to several weeks flow of the Columbia River.


8. Pollution has travelled far from the site. In 1964, a Scripps Oceanographic Research Team detected the radioactive chemical, zinc-65 8,000 times higher than normal in shellfish and squid at Cannon Beach, Oregon, 365 miles from the site. Hanford radionuclides have been detected in the Puget Sound.


The recently discovered 150-300 gallons leaking from this one container per year may not sound like much, may just be Insley's "no immediate threat"...but these stories dating back decades tell a different story.


reply posted on 15-2-2013 @ 08:17 PM by Gridrebel
Thanks for bringing this to light OP. SnF. I don't think they stabilized any of those tanks in 2005. This is one of the most horrid things. I have never figured out why in the heck they put this sh#t so close to waterways. Here are some more facts on Hanford. I realize it's a lot of text but people need to know what's going on, on the West Coast.

www.psr.org...

•Hanford is the most contaminated site in the Western Hemisphere and the world's largest environmental cleanup project.
•The Hanford Nuclear Reservation is owned by the federal government and operated by the US Department of Energy (USDOE).
•Cleanup at Hanford is a monumental task estimated by USDOE to cost at least $60 billion and take decades to complete.
•The Hanford Reach (the part of the Columbia flowing through Hanford) is the last free-flowing stretch of the Columbia River where tens of thousands of salmon spawn each year. The Hanford Reach was designated as a national monument in 2000.
•Sixty percent (by volume) of the nation's high-level radioactive waste is located at Hanford.
•More than 67 metric tons of plutonium were produced at Hanford, contributing to a global stockpile of nuclear weapons that peaked in the mid-1980s.
•Fifty-three million gallons of high-level radioactive and chemical waste are stored in 177 huge underground tanks. One third of these aging tanks are known to have leaked more than a million gallons of waste.
•At least 200-square miles of groundwater beneath the site is contaminated and migrating to the Columbia River. An estimated 80-square miles are contaminated above drinking water standards.
•Approximately 1900 waste sites have been identified at Hanford.
•Radioactive and chemical contaminants released from Hanford and other weapons production sites across the nation have caused death and illness, including cancer from radiation and lung disease from beryllium exposure. In 2000, the USDOE acknowledged that workers at nuclear weapons plants may have been made ill, and those who suffered deserved to be compensated. Since then, thousands of claims have been filed.
•Nearly 80 percent of the USDOE's national inventory of spent fuel rods was stored in basins just 400 yards from the Columbia River. The USDOE has moved the disintegrating fuel rods to a central location away from the river, but high-level radioactive debris remains in the basins.
•The USDOE wants to import as much as 200,000 cubic meters of additional waste from around the nation to Hanford. This could double the amount of radioactive waste left at Hanford.
edit on 15-2-2013 by Gridrebel because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 23-2-2013 @ 07:59 AM by seagull
reply to post by captaintyinknots



There has been an upsurge of cancer downwind of Hanford for the past half century. "Downwinders" they're called. My mother was one, and possibly my fathers mother, as well. My own brush with cancer, though much less likely, could be connected.

But what the hey, Gov. Insley, in all his infinite wisdom, says there is no immediate danger... Really, guv? Really??? Where the hell have you been for the past half century, or so? Medical history says otherwise. These tanks have, possibly, been leaking for some ten years, maybe more.


reply posted on 23-2-2013 @ 12:22 PM by dreamingawake
Originally posted by Witness2008
reply to
post by kalunom



Hanford has been leaking for years, since 1996 at least. I worked for an organization based in Seattle that had been taking Ariel photos of a stream of waste making it's way toward the Columbia basin. The attorneys I worked for that had been trying to hold the feds responsible got no where, and nothing happened after GE was awarded the management contract. I doubt anything will happen now.



Very sorry to hear about how nothing is being done. If anything more people can be aware of the risks of living "too close", not even addressing the leak into the Columbia River. The governor should be addressing the health concern of past leaks not pushing it to a later concern.

Judging by the people I've came n contact with(especially a child, mentioned before on ATS)or have heard of that have cancer, -more lately-etc. from growing up in the area, I suggest if at all possible stay clear to even move if you can further from that part of the Tri-Cities or beyond. Possibly even research into use of potassium-iodide (KI) supplements, or “thyroid blockers".
edit on 23-2-2013 by dreamingawake because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Israel angered over IAEA vote on nuclear arsenal
  Posted 13 days ago with 79 member flags
Neil Armstrong dead at age 82 - report
  Posted 17 days ago with 63 member flags
Judge orders release of detained Marine veteran
  Posted 19 days ago with 58 member flags
Birds hold \'funerals\' for dead
  Posted 10 days ago with 55 member flags
TSA agents swarm Ron Paul\'s plane, demand explosives check
  Posted 11 days ago with 47 member flags
Mysterious Changes in Ocean Salt Spur NASA Expedition
  Posted 1 days ago with 36 member flags
Ga. Murder Case Uncovers Terror Plot by Soldiers
  Posted 15 days ago with 32 member flags