It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I never stated I was a staunch defender of the 1st Amendment, certainly not as it is interpreted by yourselves, in regards to protecting secret societies.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
I have a problem with Freemasonry because it is an avenue for nepotism.
It has been and remains capable of being a detriment to the American cause that every man is equal and deserves equal opportunity for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
I don't mean to be curt, or offensive, but I find the entire thing reprehensible and an affront to all decent sensibilities of what is right and good about conduct between men.
It is a fact, as uncomfortable of a fact as it is, that Freemasonry is a Bronze Age power structure.
By adhering strictly to any historic doctrine, the natural development of human collective consciousness is stunted.
It is clinging to past concepts, regardless of any pretense of progressiveness. It is inimical to reform and self-criticism.
I know that you don't want to be told over and over again by someone that, in his opinion, you are part of something in its very nature sinister, and that I think your organization should be abolished. Certainly you've probably never done anything wrong there and are decent people. It just doesn't change the fact that it is what it is.
Originally posted by guanyu
I never stated I was a staunch defender of the 1st Amendment.
Originally posted by guanyu
However, I will express my opinion and as a staunch defender of the 1st Amendment, I ask you to respect that.
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Originally posted by guanyu
I never stated I was a staunch defender of the 1st Amendment.
Uh, yeah, you did:
Originally posted by guanyu
However, I will express my opinion and as a staunch defender of the 1st Amendment, I ask you to respect that.
Originally posted by guanyu
As a staunch defender of the 1st Amendment is a prepositional phrase where YOU is the object of the propositional phrase. I ask YOU to respect that, AS a staunch defender of the 1st amendment. They had previously indicated they were a staunch defender of the 1st amendment, I was holding them to it. Got it?
I see my request that you seriously meditate on what I had to say has fallen on deaf ears. I think I'll respectfully bow out at this point.
Originally posted by guanyu
You've illustrated your ignorance about what I have said time and time again.
You continue to attack me as a person. You've addressed what I've said. The arguments on both sides have been laid out.
I have nothing more to say to you.
Originally posted by guanyu
reply to post by nancyliedersdeaddog
Obviously, it goes without saying that I support the 1st Amendment, but we differ on our interpretations
I have a problem with Freemasonry (and similar initiatory orders and secret societies) because it is an avenue for nepotism.
It has been and remains capable of being a detriment to the American cause that every man is equal and deserves equal opportunity for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
no one can deny that Freemasonry is a hierarchy
This Bronze Age hierarchy can still be seen as a full social force in West Africa in the Poro society. Do you believe with sincerity that the Poro is a benefit to a West African's life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness?
Lao Zi's premise that ritual stagnates consciousness
By adhering strictly to any historic doctrine, the natural development of human collective consciousness is stunted. It reverts consciousness to a primitive state, of older and lower conscious development, as demanded by the ritual.
The study of the liberal arts, that valuable branch of education, which tends so effectually to polish and adorn the mind, is earnestly recommended to your consideration...
It is clinging to past concepts, regardless of any pretense of progressiveness. It is inimical to reform and self-criticism.
We, as Free and Accepted Masons, are taught to make use of it for the more noble and glorious purpose of divesting our minds and consciences of all the vices and superfluities of life, thereby fitting us, as living stones, for that spiritual building, that house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens.
I know that you don't want to be told over and over again by someone that, in his opinion, you are part of something in its very nature sinister, and that I think your organization should be abolished.
I felt compelled to interject if only because I do not see these anti-Mason criticisms as entitled, as was implicit by the thread title.