It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FrostForests
I not completely sure what they want.
It seems more, and more, and more, that they(the entire spectrum of government/media/means of controlling the minds of the populous) are obviously leaving themselves open, leaving too many clues out there, too many wounds bleeding...allowing the free thinkers and speakers to rile us up, only to give more credence against them when they push them back down.
They want something. It's not us that's catching them in this or that. They are making us catch them. They want people to loose faith. They want people to get angry over their actions. They want, I think, in the end, revolution. They are leading us against them to get what they want.
However, to say they didn't MEAN to burn this down is so disingenuous, it boggles the mind and sense of disbelief. I mean how stupid are we supposed to be here? We don't have EYES to see or EARS to hear with?? We can't HEAR the radio tapes CLEARLY showing this was anything but a 'happy accident' that it caught fire and burned???
Originally posted by redhorse
The problem is... He shouldn't of. He shouldn't have died, and he shouldn't have expected to. He dies in a fire and he gets what he wants, and the cops get what they want. At first glance this looks like a win win, at least for the parties involved.
Originally posted by InS0MnI
You guys absolutely need to read his MANIFESTO !!!
It tells alot of the missing information we are looking for ... !!!
Then what do we need to do !? Investigate even more !!!
Originally posted by GoOfYFoOt
Here is my take, ATS...
If they didn't want it to "burn" why did they use the APV to ventilate the structure? Creating those holes in the walls, would do nothing but feed the fire, and allow it to fully engulf the house as quickly as possible...