reply to post by jaffer44
A short answer to your question is, it is not OK. Americans are entitled to due process. It is a dangerous precedent that has already been set with
events like Move and Waco. A poster in a different thread pointed out other such cases, where dissidents in stand offs were burned, and the blame has
always been diverted from the possibility that the fires were intentionally set by authorities.
Here we have seen the enforcement arm again take it upon themselves to be judge, jury, and executioner.
Armed and dangerous he was, and it is justification for Dorner's death. But what is with the fires, surely to end a standoff with death, in these
instances.
The cops are too scared to come close... they lack skill and tactics but to revert to medieval method?
The conspiracy here is that the fire will be denied as having been set, as we have seen in the past incidents.
Sure, come on with your 'there was no other way...'
But this situation makes it okay now to respond to any (allegedly, perhaps even) 'armed and dangerous' person or group , by indiscriminately
destroying the place and the life within?
It is dangerous that the premise could become acceptable to LE.
edit on 13-2-2013 by ecapsretuo because: (no reason given)
edit on 13-2-2013 by ecapsretuo because: (no reason
given)
edit on 13-2-2013 by ecapsretuo because: (no reason given)