It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"Homosexuality has been observed in more than 1,500 species, and the phenomenon has been well described for 500 of them," said Petter Bockman, project coordinator of the exhibition.
"You can make up all kinds of stories: Oh it's for dominance, it's for this, it's for that, but when it comes down to the bottom I think it's just for sexual pleasure," Wolfe told LiveScience.
Conversely, some argue that homosexual sex could have a bigger natural cause than just pure ecstasy: namely evolutionary benefits. Copulation could be used for alliance and protection among animals of the same sex. In situations when a species is mostly bisexual, homosexual relationships allow an animal to join a pack.
Mom and Dad and Dad:
Almost a quarter of black swan families are parented by homosexual couples. Male couples sometimes mate with a female just to have a baby. Once she lays the egg, they chase her away, hatch the egg, and raise a family on their own...
...The argument that a homosexual way of living cannot be accepted because it is against the "laws of nature" can now be rejected scientifically, said Geir Soli, project leader for the exhibition. "A main target for this project was to get museums involved in current debate; to show that museums are more than just a gallery for the past."
Originally posted by nothingwrong
reply to post by 0mage
You are ignorant and offensive. If I had my way you would be banned for that post. I am reporting it any way for what good it will do.
Surrogates would increase population due to a gay couple, a baby that would not otherwise exist..
And you think that represents an increase in the number of homosexuals?
It isn't diminishing at all in the countries I used for the OP data.
Originally posted by 1/2 Nephilim
reply to post by mOjOm
I'm pretty sure those data sets are relative. I would dare venture to say that most spouses live in the same household.
Originally posted by undo
My point was that things like Agenda 21 may not even be necessary in light of these points and the eugenicists can all relax and go study something else instead.
When the countries gay population goes from 2% to 25% you don't think the number of children born naturally will dwindle?
The countries you cherry picked
for your study show extreme bias
and I'm guessing they best illustrate the point your trying to make
I mean why use South Africa and not any part of the North? Belgium, Sweden, the Netherlands, cmon.. those weren't picked at random.
The US shouldn't even be included in this study.
Acceptance Of Homosexuality Leads To Extinction
HOWEVER, and here's the salient point, I was not saying homosexuality acceptance was singularly capable of negatively causing the extinction of the species, only that it, in addition to other factors, it will increase the decrease in population growth over time and be proportionate to the amount of acceptance of homosexual activity