I take it you are homosexual? As it turns out we live in the same world and I can make observations and even talk to gays.
You stated, in a previous post :
"Homosexuality has nothing to do with genetics. It is a choice people make in rebellion against the natural law God has written in
That is not
, since it is not possible for you to have observed every
homosexual living, not to mention every
homosexual that has ever
lived, which would be required for you to claim so general a statement to be valid as an observation.
Nor can you legitimately claim your statement to be a conclusion, since, again, to draw such a conclusion would require personal knowledge of every
homosexual to have ever existed.
What you made was an assumption
, not an observation.
Learn the difference.
Yet another example of your inability, or unwillingness, to excercise due intellectual rigor.
Thank you Sir/Madam, you prove my point for me.
Invisible unknowable unprovable? Have you been living under a rock? Wait nvm you can even find God under a rock. Now shut your wanna be
intellectual bit*h ass up. Gays always seem to hate God and want to be smart.
My residence is, as you, yourself pointed out, of no consequence.
Vulgarity is the pentultimate refuge of the intellectually challenged (Violence is the last refuge).
Assumption aside, you pose an interesting conundrum: "Gays always seem to hate God and want to be smart."
Would you therefore argue that the reverse must
also be true? That Heterosexuals always seems to love God and want to be "intellectually
Didn't think so. And yet you set forth the notion that homosexuals apparently seek intellect ("want to be smart", as you put it), even to the
rejection of belief in some god-concept. Which you have yet to prove exists, even under rocks.
I don't buy into the theory of evolution. However, the natural LAW has been proven. It is in you (or was at least).
Evidence supporting the theory of evolution can be found in a myriad of sources, I shall not list them here. But how is it possible that something so
intrinsict to all thing, this "Natural Law" you speak of, which you suppose
in even me, left?
And if this Natural Law
, whatever it is, is so easily expelled from the very examples of nature it was, supposedly, designed to "inhabit", is
it not possible that it, whatever it is, was never intended to be a part of the thing it infests?
Afterall, I can cough out a piece of meat I may choke on far easier than I can cough out the lung it blocks.
Keep wishing it was just my Truth. There is one Truth and one Way His name is Jesus. Your intellectual rigor is wearing thin f*ck boy. Go "espouse
your inanities" into a woman.
And you worship your God with a mind/mouth like that?
This called judging. Pride is a sin. So is homosexuality. I love my neighbor. They don't like me much though, might have something to do with
my Faith. God warned me about that, and I still love them
I am not too certain you know what it means to love your neighbor. If you did, your faith (or lack of it) would not be an issue with your neighbors.
Because you would not be wearing it for them to see. That is Pride, not judging. And that is a Sin, for it is meant to cast your neighbors as less
worthy than you. And you have not the right to judge your neighbor any harsher than you would care for you, yourself, to be judged.
Security blanket? You really think living the faith is easy? I was virtually guilt free before I came back to God. Now I have to hold myself
accountable and be morally upright and all that. I also have to tell the truth when it would benefit me to lie. A clear sign I lack "intellectual
rigor" and "spout inanities."
I think that you, like many, many others, have been misled into believing in, and swearing your alligence to, a concept that promises you the
peace/Bliss of ignorance, the freedom of lack of responsiblity, the re-assuring nightlight of a candle in the forbidding darkness of the as yet known.
All for nothing more than your unquestioning obedience, and a brief lifetime of suspended critical analysis.
I think you've been decieved. I think that "something" came to you at your moment of greatest weakness and vulnerability and offered you a way out;
but only if you surrendered yourself, completely.
Who would use such coercive tactics on a helpless victim?