It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by secretsister65
reply to post by NarrowGate
The problem with the Church is that it is full of devil worshippers and that was a strategic move of the New World Order.
but in the Bible, there's lots of evidence showing that
During those days perhaps, top scientists may have been put up to the task of genetically engineering a big chunk of people in their population, altering them so that they would be attracted to the same sex, rather than attracted to the opposite one, anticipating that these people's genetic make-up would be passed down, and alternatively, lead to a lot fewer heterosexual relationships and a lot less births, resulting in a smaller population.
Originally posted by Blue_Jay33
From a certain point of view "Yes" and also "No"
The example, Sodom and Gomorrah, was a thriving homosexual city that never went extinct because a lack of babies were being born. There must have been enough bi-sexual men for the women.
But the homosexuals of Sodom and Gomorrah went extinct anyways.
So the OP is right from that perspective.edit on 14-2-2013 by Blue_Jay33 because: (no reason given)
I know this is off topic but I would like you to U2U me about the quote in your sig. If you would like, I can offer answers. All of it is addressed both in the commandments and the Bible. Many just do not care enough to properly address things like what is mentioned there.
Originally posted by toochaos4u
Obviously no. My religious neighbor has 11 welfare babies. I don't think anyone
is going to notice my lack of participation. I spent too much time raising babies of
heterosexual relatives since they couldn't get everything together to do it themselves.
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by XxNightAngelusxX
but in the Bible, there's lots of evidence showing that
That's circular logic.
During those days perhaps, top scientists may have been put up to the task of genetically engineering a big chunk of people in their population, altering them so that they would be attracted to the same sex, rather than attracted to the opposite one, anticipating that these people's genetic make-up would be passed down, and alternatively, lead to a lot fewer heterosexual relationships and a lot less births, resulting in a smaller population.
Well if there is evidence for this it is pertinent to the thread topic. Any reason to think the percentage of the homosexual population could drastically change would warrant weight on the 'opposing side'. I am working under the assumption that the number is fairly constant. That seems to be the general consensus.
You would probably really enjoy talking with the member Undo.
Originally posted by NarrowGate
Originally posted by toochaos4u
Obviously no. My religious neighbor has 11 welfare babies. I don't think anyone
is going to notice my lack of participation. I spent too much time raising babies of
heterosexual relatives since they couldn't get everything together to do it themselves.
What is the difference between a welfare baby and a baby? What if one of those 11 babies does more good than your entire family in the last century has?
Get off the high horse.