Cop-Killer Chris Dorner a hero?, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 35 times


reply posted on 12-2-2013 @ 11:12 PM by ZombieWoof
reply to post by Swills



He might be a hero to anarchists or anyone who ever thought you could fight the ****

He's no hero, but he was definitely used



reply posted on 12-2-2013 @ 11:44 PM by cavtrooper7
reply to post by bri6844


I'll say the police chief's DAUGHTER and her boyfriend.


reply posted on 12-2-2013 @ 11:45 PM by burdman30ott6
Originally posted by Screwed
Firstly, what does the average person in America consider a "hero"?

Well, we send yound men off to war and when they KILL other human beings for our "cause"/ "our freedom" then, we call him a hero regardless of the body count or the "collateral damage" of innocent civilians.
We still call them "heros" no matter how many innocent men women and children they murder....errm...."dispatch".


So then, using this definition YES, he is absolutely a "hero".


The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.

Wow dude, way to view military service through a clogged pinhole. Our soldiers don't make the decisions on who takes fire and who doesn't. Our soldiers don't decide who their enemy is. Our soldiers fight because they are ordered to fight, they kill because they are ordered to kill, and they kill who they kill because that was who they were ordered to kill. They deserve to be called hero not entirely because of what they did, but mostly because of what they made themselves available to do if called upon. You can say our military leaders are morons who sent our young men off to fight for freedoms other than America's and you can say the human cost of these wars are too high, but when you start questioning the Americans who have stood up and said "Here, if called on I will lay down my life for the lives of civilians in America", then you demonstrate that your arguments are based on a world view about as robust as the width of an ass hair. When you make the next leap to compare a man who HIMSELF decided he would kill and HIMSELF decided who he would kill with our troops, then that hair has just caught a stiff wind, blown away, and you're left holding nothing.

As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.



reply posted on 13-2-2013 @ 12:06 AM by Grimpachi
reply to post by Violater1



I don’t not usually agree with you but you are spot on with this one. He is worse than the cops he was a cop now he is a dead ex bad cop.

This guy is nowhere near a hero. Just another nut job.



reply posted on 13-2-2013 @ 12:13 AM by ErroneousDylan
Originally posted by bri6844
reply to
www.abovetopsecret.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink" rel="nofollow">post by bri6844


some people are cheering like this is a victory!

The police and fbi chased down a man who promoted honesty in government!

He wanted to spread the word of police abuse!

He payed the price with his life!

edit on 12-2-2013 by bri6844 because: (no reason given)


He paid the price with other peoples' lives as well.


reply posted on 13-2-2013 @ 12:40 AM by 2ndSEED
reply to post by Screwed



You state the pure truth and I can not understand why some many peole come on here and always go against the grain. No matter when logic is the answer. A lot of these people can not add up 1+1, come on use common sense.

This ATS member is on to something.
Instead of acting on and defending the military. War is war and no matter how you see it, praising the winner doesn't make it right!

I wanted SF to win the Super Bowl so does that make Baltimore your Heros? What I am saying is that use common sense and stop trying to resolve issues and your intrested by trying to distract the truth with confusion.
edit on 13-2-2013 by 2ndSEED because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 13-2-2013 @ 12:43 AM by Grimpachi
reply to post by Screwed



Armies fight and armies win wars armies lose wars he was no army he wasn’t at war he was nothing more than a murderer with a vendetta.

To say he was at war is an insult to all who have actually fought wars he is a disgrace to soldiers.


reply posted on 13-2-2013 @ 12:49 AM by 2ndSEED
reply to post by Grimpachi



It take all but just one mind, one person with an idea. The rest are pawns in the game. I personally don't care about this suppose C.Dorner fellow.... I just hate stubborn people with no common sense!


reply posted on 13-2-2013 @ 12:51 AM by Screwed
Originally posted by Grimpachi
reply to
post by Screwed



Armies fight and armies win wars armies lose wars he was no army he wasn’t at war he was nothing more than a murderer with a vendetta.

To say he was at war is an insult to all who have actually fought wars he is a disgrace to soldiers.


I guess you have adopted a different definition of the word "war" than I have.
If you insist that "WAR" can ONLY be fought by an ARMY then under YOUR definition, YOU are right.


In MY world, I engage in warfare everyday of my life.
Usually against myself, sometimes against a fellow human being.
Those who train in "Martial Arts" are warriors.

Martial = WAR

So then, people who are practiced in the Art of Warfare are warriors the same as any standing army.
Using your definition of "war" the only way to become a "warriOR" is to hold a gun and join the army.

I know kids with cancer who are tougher and fiercer "warriors" than alot of big bad men with guns who are "in the ARMY"

He was most certainly ar war.
and, depending on YOUR definition of the word "successful" one could argue that he WAS.


edit to add:

Which "Army" is it that is fighting "The War On Drugs" btw??
You know, since only "armies" can fight wars.
edit on 13-2-2013 by Screwed because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^