It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Miraj
Most of you in this thread are idiots.
Here's why.
You condemn the gay rights activists for boycotting the comic because of a writer they disagree with. On the grounds that he has freedom of speech.
Yet they are expressing their freedom of speech by openly stating they won't buy something written by someone that they don't agree with.
So the gay rights activists don't deserve freedom of speech but the writer does?
Originally posted by peck420
Originally posted by Miraj
Most of you in this thread are idiots.
Here's why.
You condemn the gay rights activists for boycotting the comic because of a writer they disagree with. On the grounds that he has freedom of speech.
Yet they are expressing their freedom of speech by openly stating they won't buy something written by someone that they don't agree with.
So the gay rights activists don't deserve freedom of speech but the writer does?
You're an idiot, and here is why!
The LBGT community is not trying to boycott DC due to what DC has actually released in a product.
They are trying to boycott DC based on the personal beliefs of a writer that has yet to transfer any of his personal beliefs to his work.
Would this be a precott? Like a precrime, but for boycotts?
The sad, and I mean truly sad, part of this is how many people will listen to the LBGT community because it is the LBGT community, not because of what is actually said.
edit on 14-2-2013 by peck420 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Miraj
reply to post by peck420
Are you being obtuse intentionally?
They have an equal right to boycott him just like he has his right to take a stand against gay marriage.
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by chrome413
However, the boycotters are expressing their right to protest. If, as a result, DC fires Card their simply simply doing what will maximize their profits. The truth is though that this boycott won't accomplish anything. This is a digital only series so the vast majority of the people that buy it will be Superman completionists or Card fans. These people won't boycott the series based on Card's views. Regardless of what happens no one's rights are infringed upon and DC will act in its best interest as dictated by our capitalistic system.edit on 2/14/2013 by Xcalibur254 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by forgetmenot
While I am a tiny bit disappointed that the author of one of my favorite books, and genuine Sci-Fi letgend feels this way, it is his right. If its not affecting the story, it doesn't matter what he thinks.
At St. John Lateran in Rome (traditionally the Pope’s parish church) in 1578, as many as thirteen same-gender couples were joined during a high Mass and with the cooperation of the Vatican clergy, “taking communion together, using the same nuptial Scripture, after which they slept and ate together” according to a contemporary report. Another woman to woman union is recorded in Dalmatia in the 18th century.
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
reply to post by tothetenthpower
So you'd have no issues with a KKK leader or Nazi Skinhead writing books made for kids?
CJ
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
reply to post by tothetenthpower
So you'd have no issues with a KKK leader or Nazi Skinhead writing books made for kids?
CJ
As long as they kept their nazi/racist/kkk nonsense to themselves, I don't see why not. They are entitled to their beliefs, they just aren't entitled to impose them through their work.
~Tenth
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by SearchLightsInc
Link is borked, the article is on page two of where the link takes you though.
Try this Seems OP didn't use link generation button.edit on Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:02:35 -0600 by TKDRL because: (no reason given)