It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by fourthmeal
reply to post by vkey08
Yeah, now prove it.
Because these knowledge points you claim to have cannot prove it, they can only state it. On the other hand, people OUTSIDE THE SYSTEM have proven it, through paper trails and by understanding what a TRUST really is.
So much knowledge, so little actual knowledge.
Just like you, S.O., you post that the federal highways are funded by federal dollars, no they are funded by a FEDERAL TRUST. A TRUST that is in the hands of the people. The PEOPLE fund the system, not by damn government. And by people I mean the value of their BC, because the Trusts are created via funds created by banking, which is thin-air money created with interest that pays that which created NOTHING.
I'm done.
Originally posted by fourthmeal
reply to post by vkey08
It is pure libel.
Originally posted by destination now
Either way, you need roads and pavements, who do you think should pay for them?
Originally posted by ParasuvO
My guess would be you have alot to lose, you just won't say it.
Originally posted by vkey08
reply to post by 7Thunders
1) I am far from an idiot..
2) read on oh bastion of knowledge:
Birth certificates
There are three main beliefs about birth certificates in freeman mythology:
The government uses them to create your strawman and legal person to which all your legal responsibilities, debts and liabilities belong.
As a form of registration, they transfer ownership of an individual to the state. This is what allows the state to seize your children if you don't play by their rules.
They are financial instruments or birth-tracking bonds (a.k.a. live birth bonds) that are sold by the government and then traded on the sea of international commerce, using you as security (an idea taken from the redemption movement).
Freemen claim the government secures the value of its fiat currency using its own citizens' birth certificate "bonds." It is claimed that the value of an individual's "bond" may reach into the millions. This can supposedly be proved by entering the numbers on one's birth certificate into various stock-tracking sites to show the current value of one's "bond" on the market. In reality, of course, any "bonds" found matching these numbers will be real financial instruments which match by complete coincidence.
Notwithstanding this, freemen believe that one can access the money represented by one's own "bond" though various pseudolegal methods and by filing forms with government agencies. There are plenty of conmen, fraudsters and snake-oil salesmen selling methods on how to achieve this to gullible fools. Naturally, none have ever been shown to work.
The value of one's birth certificate "bond" can also supposedly be used to discharge one's debts and financial liabilities through a process known as "acceptance for value" or "A4V", without the freeman having to gain direct access to the funds himself. The UK Treasury has stated that the existence of these bonds, as well as various other freeman financial concepts, are myths.
Fact. The organization is dissolved and I am the Executor and secured party of record in the winding up of the affairs of the organization.
Originally posted by 7Thunders
Fact. The organization is dissolved and I am the Executor and secured party of record in the winding up of the affairs of the organization..
Originally posted by Crakeur
Originally posted by 7Thunders
Fact. The organization is dissolved and I am the Executor and secured party of record in the winding up of the affairs of the organization..
What organization?
bankruptcies are public record, I'd like to look it up. please don't send me a video unless it shows the corporation name.
Originally posted by Crakeur
reply to post by OneisOne
and if you click on the Terms and Service tab in the notice of termination, this section is highlighted
◦the Content is not spam, is not machine- or randomly-generated, and does not contain unethical or unwanted commercial content designed to drive traffic to third party sites or boost the search engine rankings of third party sites, or to further unlawful acts (such as phishing) or mislead recipients as to the source of the material (such as spoofing);
I'm not sure if they highlight the reason for each termination but, if they do, it's rather telling.
Originally posted by fourthmeal
I'll consider rejoining the discussion.
Until then I hope karma visits you for your deeds.
Responsibility of Contributors.If you operate a blog, comment on a blog, post material to the Website, post links on the Website, or otherwise make (or allow any third party to make) material available by means of the Website (any such material, “Content”), You are entirely responsible for the content of, and any harm resulting from, that Content. That is the case regardless of whether the Content in question constitutes text, graphics, an audio file, or computer software. By making Content available, you represent and warrant that: ◦the downloading, copying and use of the Content will not infringe the proprietary rights, including but not limited to the copyright, patent, trademark or trade secret rights, of any third party;
◦if your employer has rights to intellectual property you create, you have either (i) received permission from your employer to post or make available the Content, including but not limited to any software, or (ii) secured from your employer a waiver as to all rights in or to the Content;
◦you have fully complied with any third-party licenses relating to the Content, and have done all things necessary to successfully pass through to end users any required terms;
◦the Content does not contain or install any viruses, worms, malware, Trojan horses or other harmful or destructive content;
◦the Content is not spam, is not machine- or randomly-generated, and does not contain unethical or unwanted commercial content designed to drive traffic to third party sites or boost the search engine rankings of third party sites, or to further unlawful acts (such as phishing) or mislead recipients as to the source of the material (such as spoofing);
BTW, if you are not familiar with David Wilcock, here is his site and, the info that he has been sharing as well. Right in line with OPPT.
Originally posted by harryhaller
Originally posted by destination now
Either way, you need roads and pavements, who do you think should pay for them?
It's already paid for. Everything is already paid for in full.