Hey "RAMBRO" Don't bother turning yourself in to Me...

reply to post by chiefsmom

You know as well as I do, If you have been following this, he has been found guilty already by the media.

Once again, you are confused. The "media" is only asserting Dorner's "probability of guilt".

Why are you denying "presumption of innocence" in regard to the "media"? It seems that you have already "convicted" them without their "day in court".

See ya,
Milt

reply to post by BenReclused


LOL Ok, just figured it out.
Thanks for playing.

reply to post by whyamIhere


Too bad this guy went on a rampage. All the points he brought will be thrown out and the problems will be swept under the rug like usual. He should of went on a media campaign instead.

reply to post by chiefsmom

Originally posted by chiefsmom
reply to post by BenReclused

 

LOL Ok, just figured it out.
Thanks for playing.

I'm glad! And, you are welcome! Did my "example" help?

I'm sorry if I seemed a bit blunt, but that's just the way I am.

See ya,
Milt

Originally posted by XLR8R
reply to post by whyamIhere

 

Too bad this guy went on a rampage. All the points he brought will be thrown out and the problems will be swept under the rug like usual. He should of went on a media campaign instead.

Now he can be swept up in a dust pan.

He might of had a point about the LAPD.

Killing innocent people is not the way to make a point.

We will never know...

reply to post by whyamIhere


You're absolutely right about that. Killing innocents is not the way.