It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by xedocodex
So guns only endangers the person you are intending to shoot? Tell that to the many people who have been shot by people aiming for someone else.
Yeah tell that to the victims of the police and the US federal government you know they have more blood on there hands that any gun owner in this country.
Originally posted by neo96
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
That ad could be interpreted as a threat to the president. That's one reason I can think of. Sounds like "fighting words".
How the ad simply said come and take it said nothing of the current potus.
I am no statitician, but perhaps if the police and military are involved in more shootings than the average gun owner, it is because thier occupation involves putting themselves in harms way? It's thier actual occupation.
That said I can scrounge up stats on "accidental shootings" between police and the average untrained gun owner if you like? But you might not like it...
Not sure if your pc or phone is video equipped, but the presidents image was featured prominently.
It's going to be interesting to see how the politicians spin this when the blood starts flowing.
Originally posted by 200Plus
reply to post by xedocodex
So you support the Kent State shootings as well then?
And the drone war (legal)
the occupation of Iraq (legal)
the occupation of Afghanistan (legal)
Not saying you do, but I hate when people pick which legal acts are right and which are not.
Is a law just if it is morally wrong?
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by Indigo5
really ???
you post someone else's interpretation of what you failed to review ??
typical ... hey, believe what you will, i've read it.edit on 12-2-2013 by Honor93 because: add txt
Originally posted by OneisOne
reply to post by Indigo5
While everything you posted is true, you missed why this is being used as part of the commercial.
That little battle kicked off what would become the Texas Revolution, a war of independence which resulted in the Republic of Texas.
Originally posted by xedocodex
Does that video actually claim that gun rights come from God????
First off, it's a horrible video...I have no video experience and I think I could make a better one. Second, it is a borderline threat to the President. Third, Clear Channel is a private company, they can do whatever they want.
Originally posted by neo96
How the ad simply said come and take it said nothing of the current potus.
Originally posted by Indigo5
I guess that it is just suprising to see the gun lobby cite Mexican history as an example of appropriate gun control. Cuz the city was Mexican, got it's cannon from the Mexican Government...and the "authority" that tried to take the cannon back was the Mexican Government.
Originally posted by Cuervo
reply to post by navy_vet_stg3
Yeah, that song doesn't promote the stereotype of fat hillbillies with guns or anything.
Sounds like a freakin' Hamm's beer commercial.
Aside from the terrible song, the message is just straight up dangerous bravado. The producers of that commercial, the writer of that song, and the makers of these guns... they are all going to be hiding behind private guards the day "they come fer yer guns".
They are simply cashing in on the gullibility of bored laborers who want a little Red Dawn fantasies in their lives. Those are the people this hurts. To me this is no different that Hip Hop artists telling young black youth to attain bitches, hoes, gats, and all that crap. It's just the rich telling the poor to kill each other.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by neo96
Originally posted by neo96
How the ad simply said come and take it said nothing of the current potus.
The VERY first words of the ad are "Mr. President" with a picture of Obama. This ad is ADDRESSED to the president and congress. Did you watch it?
Originally posted by xedocodex
The law of the land is law...if you disagree with it, fine...great...protest...work to get the law changed...but that doesn't give you the right to ignore or disobey that law. And it definitely doesn't give you the right to start shooting people who are enforcing the law.
It is frightening that you think if you don't agree with something, then you must start shooting people over it.
The VERY first words of the ad are "Mr. President" with a picture of Obama. This ad is ADDRESSED to the president and congress. Did you watch it?
Originally posted by 200Plus
reply to post by xedocodex
When did I ever say to shoot anyone?
You plainly said that as long as its a law the cops would be right in shooting people.
I NEVER said anything about shooting people. I just know where this is going to lead.
Kent State, drones, occupations = legal killings by those in power.
I find your views hard to fathom.
Citizens should lose the right to self defense because the people in power say so?
Freedom can not be taken away or given to you. You are born with it......But you must choose what to do with it. Progressives have a hard time understanding personal freedom and liberty.