It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stumason
Originally posted by dmsuse
Indeed it was, The benefits she was getting would have barely paid her transport costs getting to work.
How about you come work for me £1,80 per hour and we will see if your opinion on this issue changes or not.
Apparently, Cait Reilly lived near the Poundland in question, she has legs doesn't she? She also lives with her mother and brother, so doesn't have the worry of any real-life bills, which is probably the only reason she had the time and inclination to take her case to court. Fair play to her though for doing so.
Originally posted by dmsuse
Or are you somehow too good to work for £1.80 per hour? really?? well why expect her to do it?
Not at all, but I'd actually go and find real work rather than be on jobseekers for months. Unlike many seem to be, I am not adverse to travelling far and wide in search for work, instead of expecting to have a job 15 minutes drive from my front door.
Originally posted by AndyMayhew
Why should we pay job seeker's allowance to people who are not doing everything possible to find a job?
They are under no obligation to claim it.
But if they do, then they are under obligation to seek work. Any work. And not doing anything that may prevent them from accepting any job that comes along. That also includes undertaking work experience whilst they seek full time employment. Although, as it happens, even this isn't compulsory.
They can always stop claiming ......
Simple.
Originally posted by michael1983l
reply to post by woodwardjnr
Only the long term unemployed were put on these programmes. There has to be some sort of deterrant for those intent of living a life on benefits. Like i say i work 60 hours a week and probably do not have anything more than those career benafit takers. Makes me sick. If people lile me just gave up work there wouldnt be any money to pay benafits itis unfair on people like me that these people dont have to do a.ything for their money whilst i have to work every waking hour
Also don’t forget the Tories want to increase the probation period from 6 months to 2 years in which time the bosses can dismiss without reasons given or redress to the employment tribunal. In fact they are trying to remove the employment tribunal.
Originally posted by PhoenixOD
Dont forget that people who are on JSA have now signed a bit of paper that says once they are in a job they are not allowed to leave it or they will have their benefits drastically slashed. So people can now be forced into jobs that pay so little they can afford to live. The whole system is screwed.
Originally posted by michael1983l
The government should just refuse benafit payments then. They are under no obligation to pay them. I will tell you what slave labour is... Going to work and getting taxed to the hilt so that some lazy arse can sit at home and get given money by the government without giving anything back. Im sick and tired of being skint despite working 60 hours a week whilst people sit at home and take my tax money for free.
Originally posted by PhoenixOD
I despise the way that the government has managed to make us the people hate the less fortunate people in our society rather than look to them for mismanaging our countries economy. Its disgraceful.
edit on 12-2-2013 by PhoenixOD because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by doobydoll
I think it is only reasonable that a company pays a person for any work done for them.
How come many on here are bashing people who only want to be paid for work they do, but hardly a word against the tight-arsed companies which can conveniently find jobs for non-paid workers, but won't pay them to do those same jobs which would get them off benefits and earning a living?
Millionaire companies are ripping off the system for far more than all the unemployed people put together - some of you need to occasionally open your eyes and look further than the end of your beaks.
Originally posted by Soloprotocol
reply to post by stumason
I'm not saying you cant get £500 per week, but that is few and far between, usually London area, but your argument is that the great unwashed get handed £500 per week....utter tosh....try £71 JSA or £99 ESA per week the rest going ether to a council or housing association or private landlord...Just remember that £71 or $99 goes back onto the system in taxes...and huge taxes at that...
maybe instead of jealousy and paying lip service to Daily mail spin you may need a spell on ESA then you can comwe on here and tell everyone how you lived the high life and you never want to work again....
You gotta love the sheeple and how they allow themselves to be divided and Conquered by the Governments and media of this world...
remember...once the Tories have destroyed the unemployed and sick and disabled they will be coming for YOU.
Originally posted by Soloprotocol
currently on £64 a week, live on my own and i'm being asked to pay £8 a week for council tax and £12 a week for this new bedroom tax.....ye i'm unemployed...payed into the system for 27 years as a spray painter before i started pissing blood now on ESA...£64 a week.......yeah living the high life here...:-/
utter scum of a nation.
Am i angry...yeah...you bet. more pissed off at the sheeeeeple though for believing the tripe spewed out on Main stream media.
Jeremy Kyle watchers make me sick.....and pissing more blood.
Originally posted by Soloprotocol
currently on £64 a week, live on my own and i'm being asked to pay £8 a week for council tax and £12 a week for this new bedroom tax.....ye i'm unemployed...payed into the system for 27 years as a spray painter before i started pissing blood now on ESA...£64 a week.......yeah living the high life here...:-/
utter scum of a nation.
Am i angry...yeah...you bet. more pissed off at the sheeeeeple though for believing the tripe spewed out on Main stream media.
Jeremy Kyle watchers make me sick.....and pissing more blood.