It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Dustytoad
Originally posted by macman
reply to post by Dustytoad
You are either a person that is tolerant of ALL views, or you are not.
To pick and chose shows intolerance in itself.
No one is tolerant of all views. That's a fairy tale.. Some people are tolerant of all people, but people and views are not the same thing.
Are you tolerant of the views of an enemy shooting at you in war, or will you judge them to death with your bullets?edit on 2/11/2013 by Dustytoad because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by macman
reply to post by Dustytoad
You are wrong.
It doesn't matter if the person is gay or straight.
Does inventing computers require a gay person???? NO.
The things were invented by people. It doesn't matter if they are gay or straight.
My statement goes to the creation of the list in the first place.
They are people, not sexual demographics.
Originally posted by macman
Wait, when did I state I was tolerant of anyone or anything???
Originally posted by Dustytoad
. You are defending the guy judging whole demographics as not people remember?
Originally posted by Dustytoad
Are you tolerant of the views of an enemy shooting at you in war, or will you judge them to death with your bullets?
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by Dustytoad
. You are defending the guy judging whole demographics as not people remember?
Yes, I am.
It is his right to be uninformed, or to dislike anyone for any reason.
Originally posted by macman
reply to post by Dustytoad
Originally posted by Dustytoad
Are you tolerant of the views of an enemy shooting at you in war, or will you judge them to death with your bullets?
I don't have to be tolerant of anything.
What is the point?
Originally posted by macman
reply to post by Dustytoad
So, you are fine with someone crying foul, on someone else not being tolerant, while in their statement of foul does not reflect tolerance?
That is hypocrisy in motion.
Originally posted by macman
reply to post by dc4lifeskater
To be intolerant of the ignorant is to intolerant.
If you can't be tolerant of all, crying foul on other things really diminishes your righteous statement.
Originally posted by macman
reply to post by dc4lifeskater
To be intolerant of the ignorant is to intolerant.
If you can't be tolerant of all, crying foul on other things really diminishes your righteous statement.
Originally posted by macman
reply to post by Dustytoad
I agree, we all have the right to be intolerant.
But, don't cry foul about someone being intolerant, by being intolerant yourself.