The Secret Team, The Circus, Gladio, Henchmen of The New World Order and the Long War,
by Olav Phillips
The word “Paranoia,” essentially a thought process dominated by fear and anxiety, often to a point of irrationality but as it was once expressed
to me – Paranoids also have enemies and those enemies can be both mundane and extraordinary.
Often, in conspiracy research, when we postulate on the concept of the control system the phrase “The New World Order” comes to mind. Stolen from
a infamous but seminal speech by George Bush Sr. But in reality it was actually used in both a H.G. Wells book and more directly to describe a post
World War Two world dominated by the two great super powers.
In popular culture it has come to represent a diabolical control system of interlocking pieces which have sought, over time, to establish a control
plane that governs the daily lives, and politics as well as thought of every individual on the Earth. This control system has existed since time
immemorial and has been referred to by many names. The Illuminati, the aristocracy and many others but the purpose is not to be yet another
exploration of that control system. Other writers have thoroughly examined its history, principles, and membership. Instead I wish to explore its
henchmen. Those dark figures in the foggy night, which execute the plans and agenda’s of their hidden masters.
To do this I have broken the discussion into three pieces. The Secret Team, comprising organizations which front the control systems plans as well as
come up with their own, the circus which represents, as an homage to John Le Carre, the intelligence services, Gladio which are the foot soldiers and
lastly a wide ranging discussion of the model by which they operate.
The Secret Team
There are a great many organizations which appear to front for the powers that be. The Masons, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral
commission even Boy Scouts could fundamentally be pushed into this section. Each secretly carrying out the directives of the puppet masters. But in
saying that we need to think about what this really means.
At its most root these organizations serve a fairly straight forward purpose. Many are secret societies, some are service organizations, and others
are policy engines. But each fits into the puzzle and I believe passively enact the will of the other, that other being the control system itself.
For example we could take the Rand Corporation – the long beloved and much maligned think-tank that has shaped world policy forever. Rand as a
corporation was founded as Project RAND in March of 1946 as a project to explore the future of weaponry. It was financed on contract to the Douglas
Aircraft Company who managed the project and oversaw its results. But in May of 1948 it was spun off from Douglas as an autonomous entity to o help
improve policy and decision making through research and analysis”, using its “core values of quality and objectivity”. The founding for the
split was made by the Ford Foundation created in 1936 by Edsel Ford to fund exploration into scientific, educational, and charitable purposes.
In becoming an autonomous entity the RAND Corporation became the first modern think-tank, and through its dedication to objectivity revolutionized
foreign policy and arms control with the advent of game theory – a RAND discovery aided by Dr. John Nash who later won a Nobel Prize in Economics
for that model.
But RAND by itself is not the control system, it is simply the thinkers and discovers of theories. In fact if you went into the RAND office you would
find hundreds of dedicated people working on problems, finding solutions then leaving to go to Little League games. And while often demonized for
their part in the NOW they are not directly responsible. In fact they simply create the puzzle and figure out the shape of the pieces but they are
not the puzzle nor do they put the puzzle together. Instead, as I said, they simple find the dimensions of the board and figure out the shapes.
Organizations such as the CFR or the Trilateral Commission are also in this particular word space. They are asked to write policy documentation and
foresee future events though the tabulation of quantitative data. But they too are not the masters. They simply refine the shapes on a global
Other organizations such as the Masons or even the Boy Scouts are where we start to see the delivery of the pieces and start to put them together and
in the case of the Boy Scouts or other youth organizations they train the young how to interpret the puzzle in the appropriate way. But like many
service organizations and the root level they exist as meeting places where people hang out and are not inherently evil. Quite the contrary, I think
it could be argued they help people in some ways but as a programming tool they are very powerful because secret societies of any kind serve to create
a safe environment and perpetuate a secret doctrine and unknowingly place the pieces of the puzzle into the correct places to start to build it or at
least prepare the proper people for its construction.
In all these cases these organizations, while serving a higher purpose and working in tandem are, by design, unaware of the larger game plan. This is
probably true of all such service orientated organizations.
I’m not exactly way Le Carre chose to call MI6 the Circus but it does seem to fit in some ways. But the Circus represents those intelligence
organizations at work today, be it the CIA, KGB (oops Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation) , the MSS or even the GRLS of Iceland.
These organizations oversee the policies of their respective government and act as the intelligence apparatus. But fundamentally the execute the will
of their governments on a global chess board.
Here we begin to see, on a global level, the pieces of the puzzle being assembled. assassinations, Coup d’état’s, industrial espionage and the
destruction of global economies all pieces of a global puzzle being assembled.
Again the players themselves often unaware of the larger game plan and probably uninterested as to the ultimate goal, but each agent individually
lining up pieces.
For example maybe a think-tank points out that a certain commodity is rising in price and that will stifle development and commerce. This alarms a
politician who in turn initiates an intelligence service to assist with the overthrow of a government who has been incorrectly performing a given task
That new government, being aligned to the right way of thinking now, lowers the prices on a commodity, that commodity which is now cheaper aids a
factory in the construction of a device, but is owned by the right person who pledges a charitable contribution to the right organization which in
turn educates the youth in another country into the correct line of thinking.
You can read the rest at
I'd love some feedback!
edit on 10-2-2013 by orphillips because: (no reason given)