It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ugie1028
reply to post by xedocodex
www.abovetopsecret.com...
That will direct you to a few posts up. Thats an official document on how they can use military spy drones on US soil.
Originally posted by ugie1028
reply to post by xedocodex
accidentally hit reply before I finished.
Again go back to that post, read that document on how they can use SPY DRONES on US citizens. I also mention that they're not armed, just using thermal imaging.
fear mongering? I tried to be as straight forward as possible with the information provided.edit on 2/10/2013 by ugie1028 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ugie1028
reply to post by xedocodex
Oh so you're replying to the title and not the content in the thread.
I see what you did there...
Originally posted by baddmove
reply to post by Bramble Iceshimmer
Why don't you people pay attention?
www.psmag.com...
That is the police dept. weaponized drone..
It shoots tazers and bean bags...
that's it, no missiles...
But mission creep is common with drones.
The Pentagon said something similar two years ago about fighter-plane-sized Reaper drones deployed over the Indian Ocean: We’re only going to use these for spying on pirates, officials essentially said. Yes, they’re weaponizable, but they won’t be weaponized. By the end of this summer they were weaponized, and armed Reapers started to fire on Islamists in Somalia.
Around the same time, a Predator drone killed an American citizen, Anwar al-Awlaki, in Yemen. Even if all the people killed in those distant parts of the world were terrorists plotting hell for Americans, drone pilots do make mistakes.
Originally posted by ugie1028
reply to post by xedocodex
Its the same title as zero hedge. I did not break any T's & and C's so you can complain all you want about the title and if you took the title for what its worth (or not worth) then you're the one with reading comprehension problems.
also when you're posting something using the external quoting (news story or otherwise) you can copy/paste the title of the article... also another non-rule break. not my fault you took the title for what its worth.
didn't you know not to judge a book by its cover? or in this case the title of a thread?
Originally posted by ugie1028
reply to post by xedocodex
if you didint take the title for what its worth then why were your last 5-6 replies (which were based off the title) made?
Originally posted by ugie1028
reply to post by xedocodex
you miss the point that the rules allow it... but I explained in the thread (and the content within) that it may be different.
but veterans of ATS understand its not always about the title but the content within it... you fail to see that and continue to debate me on the title... and not the content within so... yea... why are you even wasting your time here then replying to me? whats your motivation?
Originally posted by ugie1028
reply to post by xedocodex
please give me proof on how this thread is... fear mongering...
prove it kid. show me what you got... show me and the ATS veterans what you got... if all you have is smiley faces laughing then you have a long night or day ahead of you.... because you have nothing.
yes I said it... you have nothing... unless you can prove it.
can you prove it? I wait for your next reply.
Issue is using military hardware on US citizens.
there is a difference between civilian craft and military craft. drones are military craft