Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Could This Be the End of Obama? Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ to Speak in a Conference of All the Justices of

page: 7
18
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join

posted on Feb, 11 2013 @ 06:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by MysterX
 



Originally posted by MysterX
As far as i know, she isn't running for POTUS with all that that entails.


This would mean something if the public had been calling for president's birth certificates and proof of citizenship all along. But only when THIS president got the job did people start throwing around the idea of him being a "foreigner"... All the presidents before him were just assumed to be natural born citizens, but THIS guy... is different, somehow. :shk:


This is a pretty disingenuous post. The questions arose when there was little information to be found about this president other than he was schooled as a youth in Indonesia and the fact that his father was not a US citizen. Pretty much any other person that's held the post since the requirement of citizenship was instituted had a know history and verifiable background.

Not claiming you are one, but it's funny how this topic brings the shills out from their dark crevices, though they like to make claim how silly this idea is and how crazy birthers must be for believing it.




posted on Feb, 11 2013 @ 07:27 PM
link   
reply to post by Hefficide
 


Instead of disappearing her, they just went with "what a nutcase loose cannon who gets too emotional and doesn't understand how the courts work."

It worked didn't it? In light of how Justice Roberts ruled in the Obamacare case, I don't see him defending the Constitution or ruling in favor of Orly.
edit on 11-2-2013 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 11 2013 @ 07:37 PM
link   
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 




Instead of disappearing her, they just went with "what a nutcase loose cannon who gets too emotional and doesn't understand how the courts work."

I think she's done a pretty good job of that all by herself.
You'd think an attorney could work a calendar and wouldn't think calling the Court on the carpet in a petition would be a good idea.
edit on 2/11/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 11 2013 @ 07:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by teamcommander
Does anyone know when and where Dr. Orly Taitz was born?
Has anyone here seen her birth certificate?
Maybe she is so certain about Obama's origins because she shares them, or something close to it.

I don't have any idea about the answers to these questions. I just thought I would throw them out there.
She should be required to answer the same questions which she is asking.


She is Russian born and lived in Israel, then married and moved to California. She has citizenship but she never claimed she herself would ever be eligible for POTUS.
There was a reason our Founding Fathers based the requirement for POTUS on being natural born with American Citizen parents, and that is so someone like Obama with foreign interests would not attain the highest office in the land.

Interestingly, some people in Congress were trying to push legislation to change the requirement for POTUS candidacy, and that was just shortly before the 08 election cycle. Likely Senator Obama was already being primed by the DNC and they foresaw his eligibility could be a problem. So in 08 they ran another guy with some eligibility probs, namely McCain, though born of two American citizens he was born in Panama. In my view though, at least from the standpoint of being American, Mccain still displays more characteristics of being American than Obama. Obama is plain full of hatred for the US and Americans. His contempt is beyond words. Obama is shaped by Marxist ideology, as everyone of his primary caretakers and mentors during his upbringing and career were all Marxists and radical leftists.



posted on Feb, 11 2013 @ 07:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 




Instead of disappearing her, they just went with "what a nutcase loose cannon who gets too emotional and doesn't understand how the courts work."

I think she's did a pretty good job of that all by herself.
You'd think an attorney could work a calendar.


Yes, I understand your viewpoint. She did make mistakes and it made her vulnerable to press ridicule. If she was going to be a real danger, like Breitbart or Ambassador Stevens.......



posted on Feb, 11 2013 @ 07:42 PM
link   
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 


She did make mistakes and it made her vulnerable to press ridicule.

Not so much the press. Anyone with any sense. She's an idiot.
Did you read her supplemental. Did you see how she all but accuses the Court of being complicit? Great thing to do in a petition. Brilliant work.

edit on 2/11/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 11 2013 @ 07:47 PM
link   
reply to post by WaterBottle
 





It's really not unimaginable for someone to mess up Obama's affiliation with Kenya when busy,


Oh please, Obama's books were ghost written likely by Bill Ayers as it was shown that the style of writing linguisticly matched his, and all of Obama's handlers probably know his background. If anything Obama had too much hubris to even bother with it till someone questioned it. Remember, even Michelle was videod referencing obama's "home country in Kenya". It's on video. Wanna see it?




posted on Feb, 11 2013 @ 09:48 PM
link   
reply to post by Bilk22
 





This is a pretty disingenuous post. The questions arose when there was little information to be found about this president other than he was schooled as a youth in Indonesia and the fact that his father was not a US citizen.


Obamas past isn't a mystery. The only people that think that are gullibles too lazy to do their own research. The guy has been in some sort of the public eye for decades.

Obama on TV 20 years ago...... when he was still at Harvard....OoOo how mysterious.
edit on 11-2-2013 by WaterBottle because: (no reason given)
edit on 11-2-2013 by WaterBottle because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 11 2013 @ 09:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Hefficide
 


Instead of disappearing her, they just went with "what a nutcase loose cannon who gets too emotional and doesn't understand how the courts work."

It worked didn't it? In light of how Justice Roberts ruled in the Obamacare case, I don't see him defending the Constitution or ruling in favor of Orly.
edit on 11-2-2013 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)


Ah, so since you already know that Taitz will fail, rather than admitting that it is on the lack of merit of her case, the easy way to keep the dream alive is to just assume that not only is the SCOTUS complicit, but in fact the entire GOP is as well - as none of their big hitters has ever gone to the plate carrying this particular bat. That implies that Mitt Romney spent untold millions of dollars and gave up a couple of years of his own life just to play the patsy to a foreign usurper.

Even the legendary Doctor Ron Paul has to be in on it - as he never hauled the Usurper on the carpet to let America know the truth.

OMG it really is up to Orly Taitz and Donald Trump to save the world.



posted on Feb, 11 2013 @ 09:57 PM
link   
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 


Maybe that has something to do Obama's father being from Kenya


edit on 11-2-2013 by WaterBottle because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 11 2013 @ 10:28 PM
link   
reply to post by Hefficide
 


I just knew Roberts refused to hear her case already. It seems that she needed to go through lower courts if I'm not mistaken. I know she approached him and he wouldn't talk to her.
Roberts has shown himself to be a tool of the Elite. I do not care for him just now.
I am not saying that she didn't fail based on her lack of merit, I am just saying that even if she has merit, it is likely Roberts won't give her the time of day.

I mean cmon, he declared Obamacare Constitutional because it's a tax. That was the weasel way out so he won't have to deal with angry liberals.

Anyway, this case to be heard appears to be related to the fraudulent use of Social Security numbers

______beforeitsnews/obama-birthplace-controversy/2013/01/breaking-news-chief-justice-of-the-supreme-court-john-roberts-schedules-a-case-by-attorn ey-taitz-regarding-obamas-forged-ids-to-be-heard-in-conference-before-the-full-supreme-court-2453124.html

I don't know about the entire GOP being in on it as you say....Or romney....none of that has anything to do with this, as the GOP disagreed with Roberts decision on Obamacare. So no I don't view the "entire GOP" in on it with Roberts. I do think a lot of GOP are bought and sold, blackmailed, clueless or otherwise don't care about what is really
I am sorry Orly made all th emistakes she did. She was largely self taught from what I understand. But then Barack was trained at Harvard and has zero respect for the Constitution.
So because we never heard Ron Paul speak about the birther cases, that means automatically he accepts Obama at face value?

Just because Nancy Pelosi signed off on Barry does not mean he is legit. After all, she is DSA, and on board with the agenda of turning the USA into a socialist utopia. Yes, she is on it for sure.
edit on 11-2-2013 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 11 2013 @ 10:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
I know she approached him and he wouldn't talk to her.
Roberts has shown himself to be a tool of the Elite. I do not care for him just now.


Why do you think he should have spoken to Taitz?


I am not saying that she didn't fail based on her lack of merit,


Well, that is good, as that is why she failed.


I am just saying that even if she has merit,


She doesnt - have a look at exactly what she wants the court to do, and you will see she is just a crazy woman.


it is likely Roberts won't give her the time of day.


he has better things to do than listen to a crazy woman.



posted on Feb, 11 2013 @ 10:58 PM
link   
reply to post by WaterBottle
 


No, a person would only consider a country to be his home country if he were born there.

Though in your argument maybe 10 million illegals feel that their home country is still not America.....I ask you, if you are born to an illegal from Mexico but you were born and grew up in the States, would you still consider Mexico your Home Country? That is what you are asking me to believe about barry, that he was born to a Kenyan and thinks Kenya is his home country though he was allegedly born in Hi. If he thinks Kenya is his Home Country, should he be trusted as the leader of the USA?

You cannot have it both ways. Either his allegiance is to Kenya, his "home country" or the USA. Maybe Michelle was just too stupid to realize what she was saying and let the cat out of the bag inadvertently.



posted on Feb, 12 2013 @ 12:39 AM
link   
reply to post by Hefficide
 


Ok I found a website that says that Justice Anthony Kennedy denied the case, which states that Obama used forged documents to procure his run for POTUS.


The Supreme Court's website shows that docket file no. 12A606 was originally denied by Justice Anthony Kennedy, a Reagan appointee, on Dec. 13. On Jan. 9, Chief Justice Roberts sent Dr. Taitz's application to the full court for a review scheduled for Feb. 15.


www.examiner.com...

Also the case claims that he is a citizen of INDONESIA! And the plaintiffs according the OP's link were Presidential candidates.
edit on 12-2-2013 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2013 @ 12:46 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 





think calling the Court on the carpet in a petition would be a good idea.


...or how about calling the Court on the carpet during a Presidential address..... just sayin, it's all in perception I guess. Liberals will give Barry a pass on anything he does, but will crucify his opponents.



posted on Feb, 12 2013 @ 12:49 AM
link   
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 


Ok I found a website that says that Justice Anthony Kennedy denied the case,


Good work. Except that the Examiner article got it pretty much wrong.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

But we know the story.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...


 


Also the case claims that he is a citizen of INDONESIA!

Yes. That is quite clear if you read the supplemental which is linked in the OP. You know, the one with the wrong date and docket number? The one that accuses the Court as well as just about everyone else. She is a nut. And a stupid one at that.



edit on 2/12/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2013 @ 12:54 AM
link   
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 


or how about calling the Court on the carpet during a Presidential address

That's not quite the same as trying to get the Court to hear your case while accusing them of being part of the plot. I wonder if they could actually hold her in contempt for that statement in the supplemental.
edit on 2/12/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2013 @ 01:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 


Ok I found a website that says that Justice Anthony Kennedy denied the case,


Good work. Except that the Examiner article got it pretty much wrong.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

But we know the story.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...


 


Also the case claims that he is a citizen of INDONESIA!

Yes. That is quite clear if you read the supplemental which is linked in the OP. You know, the one with the wrong date and docket number? The one that accuses the Court as well as just about everyone else. She is a nut. And a stupid one at that.



edit on 2/12/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)


Yes, I JUST got through saying that THE CASE states that he is a citizen of Indonesia and I got that info from the OP link. I got the other part about Justice Kennedy from the Examiner, but in your hurry to dismiss and ridicule me, you did not read my post carefully and assumed it all was referencing the article from The Examiner.

So did you mean THIS docket number is wrong? www.supremecourt.gov.../docketfiles/12a606.htm

www.supremecourt.gov...


Title: Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy. Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy. Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.


What was wrong about it?


Even the title of the thread says that it is on the schedule for the conference and she will be able to speak. But you are right about the date being wrong.

Also, the petition states that clerks handle the petitions and summarize them for the Court before the Court ever sees it.

Taitz provided the court with Federal Express receipts showing packages received by the Supreme Court and signed for by the employees of the Supreme Court, but never docketed and hidden from the Justices of the Supreme Court by the employees.


Looks like Orly is demanding an accounting of that incident, along with others as evidence that people working for the Court may be deliberately interfering with cases.

Even the Elena Kagan connection is a shady one, as Kagan had handled cases on Obamacare and still was able to become a Supreme Court appointee by Obama. She had handled eligibility cases as well.

But never mind all of that, Orly is just a loose cannon....
cnsnews.com...
edit on 12-2-2013 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2013 @ 02:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 


or how about calling the Court on the carpet during a Presidential address

That's not quite the same as trying to get the Court to hear your case while accusing them of being part of the plot. I wonder if they could actually hold her in contempt for that statement in the supplemental.
edit on 2/12/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)


I am not arguing on her behalf as everyone here seems to think. But why do you think the POTUS has any more right to bash the Court than she does? Obama is not King, although people like you may treat him so. But you do ask a good question about contempt of court. I do not think it is a good strategy if she really wants to get something done.
Obama was completely rude to the Justices but since it was not in a courtroom he got away with it.



posted on Feb, 12 2013 @ 02:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by hellobruce

Originally posted by RoScoLaz
hopefully, if she is convinced she has a case, she will be given the fair chance to present it.


She will not even be there.... what makes you think she will be present?


What makes you think she won't?





new topics

top topics



 
18
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join