posted on Feb, 10 2013 @ 08:51 AM
This thread was mainly inspired by this video below that I watched a while ago. I hope this is the right forum for this, please move otherwise.
Strange Computer Code Discovered Concealed In Superstring Equations!
It's a interview with a professor called Jim Gates who is a professor of theoretical physics that has discovered error correcting computer code deep
inside string theory. This code seems to be what we call
Hamming Code, invented by Richard
Hamming in the 1950s and is used for error correction in computers today.
My mathematics is unfortunately not really on par with Prof. Gates so I cannot verify his findings by myself and I have doubts that anyone on this
forum is able to either
Though it would be very pleasant surprise if there was such a talented mathematician here.
Just assuming his theory is correct and assuming string theory is also correct, wouldn't that mean that backdrop of the universe and all action occur
in it are actions of error correction? It might not be entirely obvious at first but we make corrections to our behaviour all the time from the moment
we are born, at a personal level and at a inter-personal level, from the lonely individual to humanity as a global mass. In the beginning of humanity
I suppose we would make very grave errors when we had no knowledge database to refer to and as time goes by we make less and less mistakes and we get
more refined and more harmonious. Is the reason for what we know as evil arise from failure in error correction (parental, societal and
self-reflection errors? I go by the though of as below so above in this thinking.
This thinking also ties in some with this thread:
Sacred Geometry Holographic Universe Counciousness Golden Ratio Mandlebrot Set & the
Illusion of Time
Because I think if we see our universe in a mathematical way and visualize it it would be some sort of error correcting fractal pattern, both from the
inside and the outside, error correcting itself to perfection, in and out to infinity.
Would someone care to weigh in on this if someone understand what I'm trying to say, please ask questions if something is unclear! I'm now I'm just
drawning casual relationships but I find it interesting. I'm also interested in if you think I'm just changing my theory to fit with this or perhaps
that is the right thing to do in this case.
edit on 10/2/2013 by Konoyaro because: minor error corrections;P