posted on Feb, 9 2013 @ 07:03 AM
reply to post by AthlonSavage
The only way to conclusively put this debate to a rest so that supporters and non proponents of the shard concede the truth an answer one way or the
other is too agree upon the coordinate position of the Shard and then ask Nasa for the high resolution pictures of the region around the coordinate.
We both know that's not going to happen. The 'shard,' in all probability, doesn't exist and imagery would only be doubted by people who have their
hearts set upon an alien structure being denied by all the space agencies of Earth.
According to the link that nobody checked, the coordinates are Central Latitude/Longitude (deg): +0.80/358.96.
Rather than making demands of NASA, it'd make more sense to question the provenance of the image and the reputations of the characters who've been
hoaxing the conspiracy community for years. Does Hoagland get a free pass whilst NASA get the questions? Is his woeful track-record for dishonesty a
simple, trivial matter? And is the fact that he actually has a notorious agenda no matter either?
The elephant in the room for these types of conspiracy is how quickly the probable, logical explanations are shooed away in preference to the least
likely and most complex ones. So here we go again.
Explanation 1 - There is no 'shard,' it comes from a hard copy photograph that could conceivably have been damaged or doctored to appear like an
actual structure is there. There's no chain of evidence and no other copies and the source was a person who's made a living from bizarre and
frequently demolished hoaxes.
Explanation 2 - There's an alien super-structure on the moon. NASA have planned and carried out missions everywhere but the location to trick people
into believing it doesn't exist. Russian, Indian, Chinese and European space agencies have colluded to maintain the secret. It's a National Security
secret endorsed by hostile nations and even during the Cold War Soviets played along. Every single scientist involved with subsequent moon missions
has kept quiet. Although Hoagland has been wrong many times, in this case he was right. The apparatus of the Kepler Mission and similar projects
looking for proof of life in the cosmos are actually highly expensive distractions being carried out by thousands of scientists as a charade.
Generations of scientists are unable to break the silence and must enter into some type of Faustian Pact to perpetuate the lie and have never uttered
a word during pillow talk. The alien technology has either been researched and explored or it's been left there out of fear.
Now if we're all honest, it's explanation 2 that has the support in this thread isn't it? High five!