The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.
Originally posted by AthlonSavage
I can post a coordinate position and attach a picture that looks a fuzzy resemblance to the shard pic location and argue black and blue its the
location. The coordinates you provided are anecdotal evidence.
What more do you want, then? That I go to Moon, take some photos, register the coordinates and bring them back to make you happy?
Some posters agree with your opinion and some dont. You see this is what has driven the debate in thread for so long.
As usual in cases like this, when people ask for evidence of a thing that exists only in one photo, there's not much real data with which we can work
Firstly no one except you will care about your first point.
True, but things are what they are, not what we call them. This is not a blog, this is a discussion forum.
Secondly i did have a good look for the shard on the lunar orbital imaging site in fact i posted the results on my effort at one location
earlier in this thread. If i had something more solid id post it but im not a person who is prone to making imaginary leaps.
The same thing happens to everyone, what more do you want when we only have this photo with the shard?
In regard to your second point the only one who is saying im complaining is you.
That doesn't mean I'm wrong.
Some posters have backed me up on my position, and thats why this thread has continued, and some of your posts to me which complain im not
reading your posts.
Yes, I have complained about it because you asked for some data, I provided what I could find and you admitted that you ignored it.
I dont intend to answer your next post if its going to to be a slinging of who is right or wrong, whose complaining about this or that, whose
more believable a skeptic or a believer because it belongs in Blog.
Debate known facts and if they arnt solid to allow a reachable conclusion dont imply by default we non skeptics are, unreasonable, unrealistic
or complaining just admit its your opinion based on the best data you could find.
I never imply anything, what I think I should say, I do, without the need for implying it. If you think that I am implying something else, then
that's the way you interpreted my words, it was not my intention to imply a thing, much less that anyone that presents their opinion is unreasonable
or unrealistic, and as you could see I didn't imply that you were complaining, I said that you were.
And I always present my opinions as such, that's why I said "I thought was the approximate location", "I think you are wrong" and I always say
(unless I forget it) "I think" before posting my opinion. In fact, I have been accused of saying that too many times.
You can look at all my posts since 2004 and see if I ever said that someone that had a different opinion was "unreasonable", "unrealistic" or
anything else. If you find any please tell me.
Thanks for your input.
As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.