posted on Feb, 10 2013 @ 04:31 PM
Originally posted by ArMaP
The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.
Originally posted by DazDaKing
That's just one example though, let's not mention how Nasa never talk about the pyramids on mars, the face or mars and this tower is just
It was NASA that published the photo with the "face" and said it looked like a human head.
As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.
edit on 10/2/2013 by ArMaP because: (no reason given)
Not to mention, the higher resolution face that demonstrated it wasn't as face-like as the original, lower res images suggested. Unless of course you
believe that was fake. But then, why did NASA highlight the poorer quality "face" in the first place? That's the question I always keep coming back
to, and the catch 22 NASA continually finds itself in among conspiracy theorists. If they're covering something up, why reveal it in the first place?
Let alone highlight it? They only fake things when it doesn't agree with what we want it to be, but when the evidence they provide supports our
theory we're quick to use it to support our cause.
It's like asteroid DA14 2012. It's "going to hit" and is being "covered up," even though NASA et al highlighted its existence and made such a
big deal about it being the "closest recorded passage since modern observation began" in the first place. Without which, the conspiracy theory
wouldn't have existed in the first place, because they could have simply concealed its existence entirely supposedly anyway, right? (Of course, they
couldn't. But why highlight it if trying to suppress knowledge of its true nature and if capable of doing so as conspiracy theorists believe?)
Here's one of higher resolution Mars "face" for those curious, incidentally: