It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 35Foxtrot
You know... I have yet to see a serious reply to this from any Obama supporter. It's always a quick joke or an attempt to play it down. Ha ha! I get it he said he was 50 last year, now he says he's 51 this year!!! Get it?! He's a year older!! Republicans are soo stupid!!
You're really only succeding in making yourselves look silly - and callous.
Originally posted by IAMTAT
reply to post by St Udio
Well stated, friend. Although, I doubt Obama needed any prompting from TPTB to "sit on his hands" during the Benghazi debacle.
Originally posted by luciddream
10 anti-Obama threat pops up everyday on ATS and when someone call it a nothing but propaganda, people get pissed lol.
Heck, bush done even more atrocities but its all cool and its "over". Wonder if people would be more calm if Romney won. lol
Its not about following Obama, its about leveling the playing field, because some people are out there just to hate just because they don't like them and their political side.
If there is an Anti- There would be a Pro-, deal with it.
Originally posted by jimmyx
Originally posted by 35Foxtrot
You know... I have yet to see a serious reply to this from any Obama supporter. It's always a quick joke or an attempt to play it down. Ha ha! I get it he said he was 50 last year, now he says he's 51 this year!!! Get it?! He's a year older!! Republicans are soo stupid!!
You're really only succeding in making yourselves look silly - and callous.
the reason you don't see a reply from a obama supporter, is that it has no merit, and it is not logical. although these type of posts are allowed here, doesn't make them true, or plausible
Originally posted by antonia
reply to post by works4dhs
And this is why I don't post about political crap on ATS anymore. This site has become little more than a right-wing talk board. God-forbid I have a different opinion. I must work for the DNC, I must be an evil Soros minion.
Don't make me laugh.
Back to lurking.
Originally posted by MidnightTide
Originally posted by antonia
reply to post by works4dhs
And this is why I don't post about political crap on ATS anymore. This site has become little more than a right-wing talk board. God-forbid I have a different opinion. I must work for the DNC, I must be an evil Soros minion.
Don't make me laugh.
Back to lurking.
Well, we have enough Obama apologists at the moment in this thread, so please do go back to lurking.
Would be nice if one of you could come up with a valid explanation to counter the evidence provided....(but that is cool, just shows what is being presented is fact.)edit on 9-2-2013 by MidnightTide because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jibeho
reply to post by Libertygal
The Obama bunch are in complete denial and consistently drive and post with their blinders on... His words are there in Black and White and the contradiction is very stark and real. So who's really lying? Let's put all of the Benghazi players into a locked cage match and see who comes out on top. Better yet, which "story" comes out on top. Guarantee that Obama would be at the bottom of that pile.... Fewer and fewer players, who still have political careers ahead of themselves, are willing to fall on the sword for Obama. When he's done, he's off to retire in Hawaii...
I just want the truth in this matter.... I get the feeling Obama turned a deliberate blind eye to Benghazi due to the activities that were occurring out of the CIA branch there. None of it happening in an "official capacity". When the plan backfired they were all left with their pants around their ankles. Much like Obama in a Chicago Bath House. Classic Bathhouse Barry moment.
Originally posted by Ghost375
How many times did Bush not do something about attacks happening to US troops? I guarantee a lot more troops died under Bush's watch than Obama's.
Four people died during this attack. If Obama sent more, it would be likely even more deaths would have happened.
This outrage over the attack is purely political.
Originally posted by TauCetixeta
This battle at Benghazi raged on for 8 hours.
Originally posted by Ghost375
Originally posted by TauCetixeta
This battle at Benghazi raged on for 8 hours.
and only 4 people died? Doesn't sound like an 8 hour raging battle to me.
You people are not commanders in the military. You aren't capable of making informed decisions about battles. That's why we have a commander-in-chief. To make the tough decisions. Judging his decisions from your computer chair about military matters when you don't have all the details is stupid. You're only doing it for political reasons. 4 people died, that's it. In military terms, that means he made the right choice.
If he sent more troops in and they died, you'd be complaining that he risked more troops lives!!edit on 9-2-2013 by Ghost375 because: (no reason given)