Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Dereliction of Duty: Obama Did Nothing to Save American Lives in Benghazi--and Lied About It

page: 6
52
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join

posted on Feb, 9 2013 @ 09:05 AM
link   
reply to post by 35Foxtrot
 


Obama simply 'turns off and tunes out'; ignoring ANYTHING that is either an inconvenient truth to him, his own perception of his veracity, or his personal world view ("Al Qaeda is dead", the first debate...or, more recently, the pediatric neurosurgeon at the prayer breakfast).

I'm not surprised in the least that Emperor Obama ignored the entire inconvenient episode of the unfolding tragedy in Benghazi; opting, instead, to rest up for a 'Fun-in-the-Sun', Las Vegas fundraiser with Beyonce and Jay-Z!

Obama is an A.D.D. egotist of the first order.




posted on Feb, 9 2013 @ 09:23 AM
link   
reply to post by IAMTAT
 


i don't know about his being ADD

but i can concieve him reacting just as a puppet of TPTB would do if TPTB had ordered the covert arms shipments to AQ factions in Syria from the Benghazi caches of weapons


... the Ambassador was just another black-ops puppet for TPTB. His behavior was to secretly recruit militant factions from the earlier Libyan campaign to relocate to the FSA in Syria & fight against the dictator there.... but the mercenaries had to be clean/sanitized as to never have had fought against USA forces before going to Syria

Øbama was most likely told to sit-on-his-hands, do nothing as the rebels seiged the Benghazi safe-house and covert weapons storage facility used in the black-ops/ back-door conspiracy with the AQ factions in Benghazi...

the TPTB saw an opportunity to rid themselves of a no-longer reliable 'asset' (along with 3 other Patriots on-the-scene that disobeyed instructions to NOT be involved)... to essentially "wrap-it-up" with the (intended as temporary &/or terminal) Arms & Mercenary supply line, created under the instructions of TPTB to force the desired US Policy in the future
edit on 9-2-2013 by St Udio because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 9 2013 @ 09:29 AM
link   
reply to post by St Udio
 


Well stated, friend. Although, I doubt Obama needed any prompting from TPTB to "sit on his hands" during the Benghazi debacle.



posted on Feb, 9 2013 @ 09:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by 35Foxtrot
You know... I have yet to see a serious reply to this from any Obama supporter. It's always a quick joke or an attempt to play it down. Ha ha! I get it he said he was 50 last year, now he says he's 51 this year!!! Get it?! He's a year older!! Republicans are soo stupid!!


You're really only succeding in making yourselves look silly - and callous.


the reason you don't see a reply from a obama supporter, is that it has no merit, and it is not logical. although these type of posts are allowed here, doesn't make them true, or plausible



posted on Feb, 9 2013 @ 09:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by IAMTAT
reply to post by St Udio
 


Well stated, friend. Although, I doubt Obama needed any prompting from TPTB to "sit on his hands" during the Benghazi debacle.



Indeed, ...Øbama was after all a Lawyer and smart enough to read-between-the-lines to keep mum and muddy the waters...
Hillary with him
A Blue-Ribbon-Panel investigation will never materialize because the whole sordid affair has been defused and basically the 51% that voted for re-election are Low Information voters and disinterested



posted on Feb, 9 2013 @ 09:42 AM
link   
reply to post by St Udio
 
You seem to have a tact on what is behind the scenes, I agree.

I think it was Limbaugh that made a commment that one of the Seals targeted the attackers with laser and wondered why he would do this giving his position away unless he was told there were assets in the sky.............it got him and his partner killed with direct motor shoots I belive, just a thought.

That being said and to stay on post my theroy on Obama and Hillery doing nothing is an agenda that if known would explain a lot as what this administration does and will never be held accountable for (like Holder).............you see there is no one to hold them accountable, they were installed for these very reasons.

Just my opinion.

edit on 9-2-2013 by Battleline because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 9 2013 @ 09:49 AM
link   
reply to post by jibeho
 
Obama like Holder will not be held accountable for anything, they will ignore any and all that comes there way because there is no one to do anything. Hillary, samething or anyone connected with this administration that follows the agenda that these people were installed for.
The Obama followers and shills that protect this agenda are all over the net now, just look for the hate and ridicule and the lack of any civil debate or referenced facts.

edit on 9-2-2013 by Battleline because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 9 2013 @ 10:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by luciddream
10 anti-Obama threat pops up everyday on ATS and when someone call it a nothing but propaganda, people get pissed lol.

Heck, bush done even more atrocities but its all cool and its "over". Wonder if people would be more calm if Romney won. lol

Its not about following Obama, its about leveling the playing field, because some people are out there just to hate just because they don't like them and their political side.

If there is an Anti- There would be a Pro-, deal with it.


I would be calm if the constitution party or socialist party had won the 2012 presidential elections.

But I still have to say that george bush jr and dick cheney murdered 3000 people on 9-11-2001 and no politician or judicial officer cares to bring those two treacherous war criminals to justice. Instead people like bill clinton go on stage mocking 9-11 truthers and continue to push for war in the middle east as though that can do anything but excacerbate the situation.

Barrack Obama was for a limited israeli state but it seems he changed his tune after aipac got to him. Now he is covertly funneling resources to the muslim brotherhood to overthrow libyan and syrian governments regardless what the majority of each respective population wants.

Someone is and has been pulling strings all along and it sure as hell ain't me. Time to take the blinders off and vote for the constitution party or socialist party. Even the greens and libertarians are better parties then these two satanically controlled turds.



posted on Feb, 9 2013 @ 10:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by jimmyx

Originally posted by 35Foxtrot
You know... I have yet to see a serious reply to this from any Obama supporter. It's always a quick joke or an attempt to play it down. Ha ha! I get it he said he was 50 last year, now he says he's 51 this year!!! Get it?! He's a year older!! Republicans are soo stupid!!


You're really only succeding in making yourselves look silly - and callous.


the reason you don't see a reply from a obama supporter, is that it has no merit, and it is not logical. although these type of posts are allowed here, doesn't make them true, or plausible


Actions speak louder than words and guess what buddy, you are wwaayy oofff!

No republican or democratic president or even vice president has EVER done jail time. They think they are above the law as all it takes is a presidential pardon from the succedding elected government, or their political cohorts in the justice department to turn a complete blind eye...and that is exactly what happens!

Fast and Furious, Benghazi, 9-11-2001 attacks is all the proof one needs. Don't get me wrong, I used to be a mild democrat supporter, but then I realised they are just as bad as the republicans. There is hardely and difference at all, except empty rhetoric.

There are 10 parties to choose from and people should take advantage while they still can. Start local, then state and then federal. Put libertarians, greens, constitutionalists, socialists in office. Work from the ground up so that the federal elected officials are not lame duck representatives. I have had this discussion with others and they agree with me. The duopoly needs to die regardless what the bought-out media wants and they are the biggest turds of all.



posted on Feb, 9 2013 @ 10:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by antonia
reply to post by works4dhs
 


And this is why I don't post about political crap on ATS anymore. This site has become little more than a right-wing talk board. God-forbid I have a different opinion. I must work for the DNC, I must be an evil Soros minion.

Don't make me laugh.

Back to lurking.


Well, we have enough Obama apologists at the moment in this thread, so please do go back to lurking.

Would be nice if one of you could come up with a valid explanation to counter the evidence provided....(but that is cool, just shows what is being presented is fact.)
edit on 9-2-2013 by MidnightTide because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 9 2013 @ 11:52 AM
link   
So what about 9-11? Bush and his national security team had over 100 warnings from Feb of that year that "Bin Laden determined to attack America".Where is your outrage??? Hypocrite. 4 people were killed in Benghazi vs two thousand on 9-11. If you count the people killed in Afganistan and Iraq since then that number is above half a million. Why are you not outraged that Bush and company distorted facts and lied directly to the American People and the UN about mythical chemical weapons. Over 4 thousand American Service members have died as a direct result of the negligence shown by Bush and his National Security team. But yes please get bent out of shape about 4 people vs over a half million. If only Republicans had shown a fraction of the outrage they have over Benghazi the world would be a better place. Get a clue.
edit on 9-2-2013 by GArnold because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 9 2013 @ 11:58 AM
link   
reply to post by GArnold
 


I know many Republicans who were against Bush, and since those events many of them are no longer Republicans and are finally awake to the two party scam.

Make no mistake - Bush was a globalist and so is Obama.



posted on Feb, 9 2013 @ 12:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by MidnightTide

Originally posted by antonia
reply to post by works4dhs
 


And this is why I don't post about political crap on ATS anymore. This site has become little more than a right-wing talk board. God-forbid I have a different opinion. I must work for the DNC, I must be an evil Soros minion.

Don't make me laugh.

Back to lurking.


Well, we have enough Obama apologists at the moment in this thread, so please do go back to lurking.

Would be nice if one of you could come up with a valid explanation to counter the evidence provided....(but that is cool, just shows what is being presented is fact.)
edit on 9-2-2013 by MidnightTide because: (no reason given)


People like you accuse the democrats of everything and give the republicans a free pass. How exactly is that fair? If it is ok to be a republican hack, then why is not ok to be a democrat hack? One hack is calling the other hack a hack. Do you fail to see the hypocrisy?

Just out of curiousity where is your anger for the 9-11-2001 attack done by bush and company? Do you think there was no conspiracy there? Have you even posted on the 9-11 board here on ATS? Probably not!



posted on Feb, 9 2013 @ 12:04 PM
link   
reply to post by GArnold
 


Ummm if you think everyone isn't still outraged about 9/11 you'd be naive. There's a whole forum dedicated to the outrage. This new 9/11 attack is just more outrage to blame all Washington DC.

Bush sucked.

Obama sucks.

But all of DC has always sucked and will forever be the cradle for American suckage & evil.



posted on Feb, 9 2013 @ 12:16 PM
link   
How many times did Bush not do something about attacks happening to US troops? I guarantee a lot more troops died under Bush's watch than Obama's.

Four people died during this attack. If Obama sent more, it would be likely even more deaths would have happened.
This outrage over the attack is purely political.



posted on Feb, 9 2013 @ 12:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by jibeho
reply to post by Libertygal
 


The Obama bunch are in complete denial and consistently drive and post with their blinders on... His words are there in Black and White and the contradiction is very stark and real. So who's really lying? Let's put all of the Benghazi players into a locked cage match and see who comes out on top. Better yet, which "story" comes out on top. Guarantee that Obama would be at the bottom of that pile.... Fewer and fewer players, who still have political careers ahead of themselves, are willing to fall on the sword for Obama. When he's done, he's off to retire in Hawaii...

I just want the truth in this matter.... I get the feeling Obama turned a deliberate blind eye to Benghazi due to the activities that were occurring out of the CIA branch there. None of it happening in an "official capacity". When the plan backfired they were all left with their pants around their ankles. Much like Obama in a Chicago Bath House. Classic Bathhouse Barry moment.


It was 2 months before the election. Obama was hiding under his desk.


Leon Panetta had a hard time looking Senator Lindsey Graham in the eye.
It's almost as if he was trying to hide.



posted on Feb, 9 2013 @ 12:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ghost375
How many times did Bush not do something about attacks happening to US troops? I guarantee a lot more troops died under Bush's watch than Obama's.

Four people died during this attack. If Obama sent more, it would be likely even more deaths would have happened.
This outrage over the attack is purely political.


This battle at Benghazi raged on for 8 hours. The orders from Obama during those 8 hours?

Stand down. Let them die.
Forces from Italy could have been ordered in.
This stinks to high heaven.



posted on Feb, 9 2013 @ 12:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by TauCetixeta
This battle at Benghazi raged on for 8 hours.

and only 4 people died? Doesn't sound like an 8 hour raging battle to me.

You people are not commanders in the military. You aren't capable of making informed decisions about battles. That's why we have a commander-in-chief. To make the tough decisions. Judging his decisions from your computer chair about military matters when you don't have all the details is stupid. You're only doing it for political reasons. 4 people died, that's it. In military terms, that means he made the right choice.

If he sent more troops in and they died, you'd be complaining that he risked more troops lives!!
edit on 9-2-2013 by Ghost375 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 9 2013 @ 12:54 PM
link   
reply to post by Ghost375
 


Only four lives? Thats how you sum it up?

Obama and Hillary, and all of them will never escape this, it will hang over them
like dark coulds for the rest of their political lives. Thats how the people see it,
those that are not part of the White House cyber force.
edit on 9-2-2013 by burntheships because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 9 2013 @ 12:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ghost375

Originally posted by TauCetixeta
This battle at Benghazi raged on for 8 hours.

and only 4 people died? Doesn't sound like an 8 hour raging battle to me.

You people are not commanders in the military. You aren't capable of making informed decisions about battles. That's why we have a commander-in-chief. To make the tough decisions. Judging his decisions from your computer chair about military matters when you don't have all the details is stupid. You're only doing it for political reasons. 4 people died, that's it. In military terms, that means he made the right choice.

If he sent more troops in and they died, you'd be complaining that he risked more troops lives!!
edit on 9-2-2013 by Ghost375 because: (no reason given)


If Obama would have done his job, then 0 people would have died.
He was hiding under his desk. Obama talked to Leon Panetta ......once.
Watch the above videos.

Hillary also has blood on her hands.
Her response? .....4 people are dead? ..........What difference does it make?





new topics

top topics



 
52
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join