Dereliction of Duty: Obama Did Nothing to Save American Lives in Benghazi--and Lied About It, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 52 times
Topic started on 8-2-2013 @ 11:54 AM by jibeho
This was discussed around ATS back in October and now we have even more testimony to apply to Obama's complete inaction...

Yesterday was a very telling day in the hearing room. How will Obama back pedal?
Nothing. That is what President Barack Obama did on the night of September 11, 2012, as terrorists attacked the U.S. consulate in Benghazi and killed four Americans, among them Ambassador Christopher Stevens. President Obama’s inaction was revealed in testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Thursday by outgoing Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and Joint Chiefs of Staff General Martin Dempsey.

Under direct questioning by Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-NH), Panetta admitted that he had no communication with President Obama after their “pre-scheduled” meeting at 5:00 p.m. EDT. The attack on the consulate had already been under way for 90 minutes at that time. Neither the president nor anyone else from the White House called afterwards to check what was happening; the Commander-in-Chief had left it “up to us,” said Panetta


The lie

Panetta’s testimony directly contradicts President Obama’s own claim to have issued “three direectives” as soon as he learned “what was going on” in Benghazi. As he told a Denver reporter in October:


I gave three very clear directives. Number one, make sure we are securing our personnel and that we are doing whatever we need to. Number two, we are going to investigate exactly what happened and make sure it doesn't happen again. Number three, find out who did this so we can bring them to justice.

That same claim was subsequently repeated by other Democrats, including Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel, who came to the president’s defense. But if those directives were indeed given--and proof has never been produced--they were given long after the attack, not while the attack was going on, during which time the president did nothing.


Hillary could not be bothered either... Were they all turning a blind eye to the arms deals that were going on to arm Syrian Rebels... Me no Know.....

Panetta and Dempsey also admitted, under questioning by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), that they were not in touch with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during the attacks, and did not receive a request for help from the State Department. Dempsey also testified that he had been “surprised” at Clinton’s testimony last month that she did not know of an urgent cable from Ambassador Stevens last August about the dire security situation.

To borrow a metaphor from the 2008 Democratic primary campaign: when the 3 a.m. call came (at 5 p.m. in the afternoon), neither Clinton nor Obama were there to respond.

Panetta was also forced to admit, in the face of vigorous questioning by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), that no military action at all had been taken to intervene in Benghazi after the attack had begun, promising only that a similar lapse would not happen again.


Well there you have it folks. We know have about 5 different accounts regarding what happened that fateful and sad night....

This was all about protecting the election!!!!! Obama needed to run from this as far as possible. Ever wonder why the Marines sent to help were ordered to change out of their uniforms before coming to the rescue?

What a mess!! Time for a formal process to sort out all of the BS. In classic Iran contra format for the whole world to see...
www.breitbart.com...


reply posted on 8-2-2013 @ 12:28 PM by Libertygal
reply to post by luciddream



Yeah, the death of four Americans, one an Ambassador, is really something to troll about.

That was so funny. /S

It is one of the most egregious moves by this administration, topping Fast and Furious. Both, however, leaving the blood of others on Obama's hands.

Meanwhile, people scramble to continue to attempt to cover for the Emperor that no longer has any clothes. The veil is lifting.



reply posted on 8-2-2013 @ 12:38 PM by luciddream
reply to post by Libertygal



Yeah, Obama set them up to be killed for his hobby. MAKE SENSE!


reply posted on 8-2-2013 @ 01:26 PM by jibeho
reply to post by Libertygal



The Obama bunch are in complete denial and consistently drive and post with their blinders on... His words are there in Black and White and the contradiction is very stark and real. So who's really lying? Let's put all of the Benghazi players into a locked cage match and see who comes out on top. Better yet, which "story" comes out on top. Guarantee that Obama would be at the bottom of that pile.... Fewer and fewer players, who still have political careers ahead of themselves, are willing to fall on the sword for Obama. When he's done, he's off to retire in Hawaii...

I just want the truth in this matter.... I get the feeling Obama turned a deliberate blind eye to Benghazi due to the activities that were occurring out of the CIA branch there. None of it happening in an "official capacity". When the plan backfired they were all left with their pants around their ankles. Much like Obama in a Chicago Bath House. Classic Bathhouse Barry moment.


reply posted on 8-2-2013 @ 01:38 PM by Jaellma
reply to post by jibeho

Enough!

If your goal is to expose the supposed lies Obama said and educate others, then yeah, this is a good bedtime story.

If your goal is to try exposing him and have him ousted, you will have better luck flying through the sun without getting burned.

We are all free to say certain things on ATS but in this case, I gotta tell ya, buddy, give it up!


reply posted on 8-2-2013 @ 01:55 PM by jibeho
Originally posted by Jaellma
reply to
post by jibeho

Enough!

If your goal is to expose the supposed lies Obama said and educate others, then yeah, this is a good bedtime story.

If your goal is to try exposing him and have him ousted, you will have better luck flying through the sun without getting burned.

We are all free to say certain things on ATS but in this case, I gotta tell ya, buddy, give it up!



He would love it if people would just give it up and join in lock step. Not gonna happen! Thanks for your input. Don't like it, ignore it... That's why ATS is so great. This is far worse than Iran Contra which commanded the airwaves of network TV in its era. I'll do what I do...


reply posted on 8-2-2013 @ 02:20 PM by 35Foxtrot
reply to post by luciddream



Maybe not "for his hobby," but by failing to act (hell, by failing to pick up his effing phone to check in and DO something) stains his hands with American blood.
Maybe he's just incompetent... Or maybe he IS truly evil - I doubt it, but who really knows, right? Whichever, this type of (in)action is not what I expect of a president.
edit on 8/2/13 by 35Foxtrot because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 8-2-2013 @ 02:23 PM by 35Foxtrot
reply to post by luciddream



I've got no problem with differing points of view -anti, pro, whatever.

So lets hear your side again? What justifies this?


reply posted on 8-2-2013 @ 02:26 PM by xedocodex
Originally posted by Libertygal
reply to
post by luciddream



Yeah, the death of four Americans, one an Ambassador, is really something to troll about.

That was so funny. /S



What else left is there to do with rabid anti-Obama people?

"the lie" in the OP isn't a lie to anyone except those inside the Right Wing bubble who listen to Fox News, Limbaugh, Hannity, and Beck. Panetta was asked what ACTIONS they took against the attacks...he said "none"...because they didn't...it was a quick attack, done and over. The CIA responded and that was that...attack over...end of story. Obama siad they are going to do things to INVESTIGATE the attack...and the OP tries to say that is an ACTION against the attacks.

It's Right Wing lunacy plain and simple...there is nothing left to do except make fun of their idiocy.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^